Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37095394›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2023

Single-cell transcriptomic landscape of the developing human spinal cord.

Jimena Andersen, Nicholas Thom, Jennifer L Shadrach, Xiaoyu Chen, Massimo Mario Onesto, Neal D Amin, Se-Jin Yoon, Li Li, William J Greenleaf, Fabian Müller and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Glial cells in neuropathic pain.Physiological reviews · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Injury and therapy in a human spinal cord organoid.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jimena Andersen *Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9320-6507
Nicholas Thom *Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jennifer L ShadrachDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Xiaoyu ChenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Massimo Mario OnestoDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Neal D AminDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2027-1329
Se-Jin YoonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8412-5991
Li LiDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
William J GreenleafDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1409-3095
Fabian MüllerDepartment of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5809-2321
Anca M PașcaDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0445-9009
Julia A KaltschmidtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2893-1793
Sergiu P PașcaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. spasca@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3216-3248
Neurosciences Institute · USStanford University · USEmory University · USSaarland University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding spinal cord assembly is essential to elucidate how motor behavior is controlled and how disorders arise. The human spinal cord is exquisitely organized, and this complex organization contributes to the diversity and intricacy of motor behavior and sensory processing. But how this complexity arises at the cellular level in the human spinal cord remains unknown. Here we transcriptomically profiled the midgestation human spinal cord with single-cell resolution and discovered remarkable heterogeneity across and within cell types. Glia displayed diversity related to positional identity along the dorso-ventral and rostro-caudal axes, while astrocytes with specialized transcriptional programs mapped into white and gray matter subtypes. Motor neurons clustered at this stage into groups suggestive of alpha and gamma neurons. We also integrated our data with multiple existing datasets of the developing human spinal cord spanning 22 weeks of gestation to investigate the cell diversity over time. Together with mapping of disease-related genes, this transcriptomic mapping of the developing human spinal cord opens new avenues for interrogating the cellular basis of motor control in humans and guides human stem cell-based models of disease.

Indexed as

Spinal CordTranscriptomeGray MatterHumansMotor NeuronsNeuroglia

Identifiers

PMID37095394
OpenAlexW4366823419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.