Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37095360›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Quantitative susceptibility mapping evaluation of glioma.

Shanmei Zeng, Hui Ma, Dingxiang Xie, Yingqian Huang, Mengzhu Wang, Wenting Zeng, Nengjin Zhu, Zuliwei Ma, Zhiyun Yang, Jianping Chu and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shanmei ZengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangdong, 510080, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Hui MaDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangdong, 510080, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Dingxiang XieDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangdong, 510080, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Yingqian HuangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangdong, 510080, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Mengzhu WangDepartment of MR Scientific Marketing, Siemens Healthineers, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Wenting ZengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangdong, 510080, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Nengjin ZhuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangdong, 510080, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zuliwei MaDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangdong, 510080, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhiyun YangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangdong, 510080, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jianping ChuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangdong, 510080, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. chujping@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Jing ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58 Zhongshan Road 2, Guangdong, 510080, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. zhaoj23@mail.sysu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9270-3250

Funding

Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province 2020A1515011436Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province 2021A1515012279Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province 2022A1515011264National Natural Science Foundation of China NSFC 82172015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo comprehensively evaluate the glioma using quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). MATERIALS AND

methodsForty-two patients (18 women; mean age, 45 years) with pathologically confirmed gliomas were retrospectively included. All the patients underwent conventional and advanced MRI examinations (QSM, DWI, MRS, etc.). Five patients underwent paired QSM (pre- and post-enhancement). Four Visually Accessible Rembrandt Image (VASARI) features and intratumoural susceptibility signal (ITSS) were observed. Three ROIs each were manually drawn separately in the tumour parenchyma with relatively high and low magnetic susceptibility. The association between the tumour's magnetic susceptibility and other MRI parameters was also analysed.

resultsMorphologically, gliomas with heterogeneous ITSS were more similar to high-grade gliomas (p = 0.006, AUC: 0.72, sensitivity: 70%, and specificity: 73%). Heterogeneous ITSS was significantly associated with tumour haemorrhage, necrosis, diffusion restriction, and avid enhancement but did not change between pre- and post-enhanced QSM. Quantitatively, tumour parenchyma magnetic susceptibility had limited value in grading gliomas and identifying IDH mutation status, whereas the relatively low magnetic susceptibility of the tumour parenchyma helped identify oligodendrogliomas in IDH mutated gliomas (AUC = 0.78) with high specificity (100%). The relatively high tumour magnetic susceptibility significantly increased after enhancement (p = 0.039). Additionally, we found that the magnetic susceptibility of the tumour parenchyma was significantly correlated with ADC (r = 0.61) and Cho/NAA (r = 0.40).

conclusionsQSM is a promising candidate for the comprehensive evaluation of gliomas, except for IDH mutation status. The magnetic susceptibility of tumour parenchyma may be affected by tumour cell proliferation. KEY POINTS: • Morphologically, gliomas with a heterogeneous intratumoural susceptibility signal (ITSS) are more similar to high-grade gliomas (p = 0.006; AUC, 0.72; sensitivity, 70%; and specificity, 73%). Heterogeneous ITSS was significantly associated with tumour haemorrhage, necrosis, diffusion restriction, and avid enhancement but did not change between pre- and post-enhanced QSM. • Tumour parenchyma's relatively low magnetic susceptibility helped identify oligodendroglioma with high specificity. • Tumour parenchyma magnetic susceptibility was significantly correlated with ADC (r = 0.61) and Cho/NAA (r = 0.40).

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaOligodendrogliomaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHemorrhageHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityGliomaHaemorrhageMagnetic resonance imagingNecrosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.