Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37095353›Full record

ReviewHuman genetics2023

Prenatal diagnosis in the fetal hyperechogenic kidneys: assessment using chromosomal microarray analysis and exome sequencing.

Ruibin Huang, Fang Fu, Hang Zhou, Lu Zhang, Tingying Lei, Ken Cheng, Shujuan Yan, Fei Guo, You Wang, Chunling Ma and 8 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Human genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ruibin Huang *Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Fang Fu *Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Hang Zhou *Prenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Lu ZhangPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Tingying LeiPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Ken ChengPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Shujuan YanPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Fei GuoPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510620, Guangdong, China.
You WangPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Chunling MaPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Ru LiPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Qiuxia YuPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Qiong DengPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Lushan LiPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Xin YangPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Jin HanPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Dongzhi LiPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510620, Guangdong, China.
Can LiaoPrenatal Diagnostic Center, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510620, Guangdong, China. canliao6008@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0056-5453
Guangzhou Medical University · CNSouthern Medical University · CNGuangzhou Women and Children Medical Center · CNSouth China University of Technology · CN

Funding

National Key R&D Program 2021YFC2701002National Natural Science Foundation of China 81771594National Natural Science Foundation of China 81801461National Natural Science Foundation of China 81873836National Natural Science Foundation of China 82101796National Natural Science Foundation of China 82201884Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2019A1515012034Project of Guangzhou Science and Technology Bureau 202201010879Project of Guangzhou Science and Technology Bureau 202201020643Project of Guangzhou Science and Technology Bureau 20221A011029Research Foundation of Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center for Clinical Doctors 2020BS030
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fetal hyperechogenic kidneys (HEK) is etiologically a heterogeneous disorder. The aim of this study was to identify the genetic causes of HEK using prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and exome sequencing (ES). From June 2014 to September 2022, we identified 92 HEK fetuses detected by ultrasound. We reviewed and documented other ultrasound anomalies, microscopic and submicroscopic chromosomal abnormalities, and single gene disorders. We also analyzed the diagnostic yield of CMA and ES and the clinical impact the diagnosis had on pregnancy management. In our cohort, CMA detected 27 pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) in 25 (25/92, 27.2%) fetuses, with the most common CNV being 17q12 microdeletion syndrome. Among the 26 fetuses who underwent further ES testing, we identified 7 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants and 8 variants of uncertain significance in 9 genes in 12 fetuses. Four novel variants were first reported herein, expanding the mutational spectra for HEK-related genes. Following counseling, 52 families chose to continue the pregnancy, and in 23 of them, postnatal ultrasound showed no detectable renal abnormalities. Of these 23 cases, 15 had isolated HEK on prenatal ultrasound. Taken together, our study showed a high rate of detectable genetic etiologies in cases with fetal HEK at the levels of chromosomal (aneuploidy), sub-chromosomal (microdeletions/microduplications), and single gene (point mutations). Therefore, we speculate that combined CMA and ES testing for fetal HEK is feasible and has good clinical utility. When no genetic abnormalities are identified, the findings can be transient, especially in the isolated HEK group.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsPrenatal DiagnosisChromosome AberrationsExome SequencingFemaleFetusHumansKidneyMicroarray AnalysisPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID37095353
OpenAlexW4366816687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.