Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37095349›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2024

Efficient evolution of human antibodies from general protein language models.

Brian L Hie, Varun R Shanker, Duo Xu, Theodora U J Bruun, Payton A Weidenbacher, Shaogeng Tang, Wesley Wu, John E Pak, Peter S Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 251 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
251citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

251 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A p53Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Computationally Evidence-Grounded Sequence-First Design of Peptide Binders.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article

191 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Brian L HieDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. brianhie@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3224-8142
Varun R ShankerSarafan ChEM-H, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4443-9229
Duo XuDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0483-8719
Theodora U J BruunDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7462-2537
Payton A WeidenbacherSarafan ChEM-H, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7692-0458
Shaogeng TangDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3904-492X
Wesley WuChan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4594-0699
John E PakChan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Peter S KimDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. kimpeter@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6503-4541

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM145402 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Katrin F. Chua · 2022 to 2026
$10.0M
Creating high-resolution, epitope-focused vaccinesDP1AI158125 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KIM, PETER S · 2020 to 2024
$5.9M
Stanford ChEM-H Chemistry/Biology Interface Predoctoral Training ProgramT32GM139791 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Carolyn Bertozzi, Christine Jacobs-Wagner · 2021 to 2026
$2.4M
Cell Surface Receptor Recognition and Membrane Fusion in Mammalian FertilizationK99HD104924 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI TANG, SHAOGENG · 2021 to 2022
$383k
NIAID NIH HHS DP1 AI158125NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD104924NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM139791NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural evolution must explore a vast landscape of possible sequences for desirable yet rare mutations, suggesting that learning from natural evolutionary strategies could guide artificial evolution. Here we report that general protein language models can efficiently evolve human antibodies by suggesting mutations that are evolutionarily plausible, despite providing the model with no information about the target antigen, binding specificity or protein structure. We performed language-model-guided affinity maturation of seven antibodies, screening 20 or fewer variants of each antibody across only two rounds of laboratory evolution, and improved the binding affinities of four clinically relevant, highly mature antibodies up to sevenfold and three unmatured antibodies up to 160-fold, with many designs also demonstrating favorable thermostability and viral neutralization activity against Ebola and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pseudoviruses. The same models that improve antibody binding also guide efficient evolution across diverse protein families and selection pressures, including antibiotic resistance and enzyme activity, suggesting that these results generalize to many settings.

Indexed as

Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralHumansMutationNeutralization TestsSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID37095349
PMCPMC10869273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.