Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37095310›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023

Artificial Intelligence Model Trained with Sparse Data to Detect Facial and Cranial Bone Fractures from Head CT.

Huan-Chih Wang, Shao-Chung Wang, Jiun-Lin Yan, Li-Wei Ko

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Disk Harmonic Mapping of Cranial Surfaces for Fracture Visualization.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Huan-Chih WangDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Chungshan Rd, No. 7, Taipei City 100, Taiwan. jessehcwang@ntu.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0001-6192-853X
Shao-Chung WangDepartment of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Gung Medical Foundation, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital, Chang , New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Jiun-Lin YanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.
Li-Wei KoDepartment of Biological Science & Technology, College of Biological Science and Technology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWChang Gung University · TWTaipei Municipal YangMing Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of cranial and facial bone fractures is an important finding on non-enhanced head computed tomography (CT) scans from patients who have sustained head trauma. Some prior studies have proposed automatic cranial fracture detections, but studies on facial fractures are lacking. We propose a deep learning system to automatically detect both cranial and facial bone fractures. Our system incorporated models consisting of YOLOv4 for one-stage fracture detection and improved ResUNet (ResUNet++) for the segmentation of cranial and facial bones. The results from the two models mapped together provided the location of the fracture and the name of the fractured bone as the final output. The training data for the detection model were the soft tissue algorithm images from a total of 1,447 head CT studies (a total of 16,985 images), and the training data for the segmentation model included 1,538 selected head CT images. The trained models were tested on a test dataset consisting of 192 head CT studies (a total of 5,890 images). The overall performance achieved a sensitivity of 88.66%, a precision of 94.51%, and an F1 score of 0.9149. Specifically, the cranial and facial regions were evaluated and resulted in a sensitivity of 84.78% and 80.77%, a precision of 92.86% and 87.50%, and F1 scores of 0.8864 and 0.8400, respectively. The average accuracy for the segmentation labels concerning all predicted fracture bounding boxes was 80.90%. Our deep learning system could accurately detect cranial and facial bone fractures and identify the fractured bone region simultaneously.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSkull FracturesAlgorithmsFacial BonesHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputer-aided diagnosis (CAD)Deep learningHead CTSkull fracture

Identifiers

PMID37095310
PMCPMC10407005
OpenAlexW4366824263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.