Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37094991›Full record

ReviewStroke and vascular neurology2023

Cerebral haemodynamics in symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease: a narrative review of the assessment methods and clinical implications.

Yuying Liu, Shuang Li, Xuan Tian, Thomas W Leung, Liping Liu, David S Liebeskind, Xinyi Leng

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Stroke and vascular neurology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hemodynamic outcomes of stenting for vertebrobasilar insufficiency in patients with a low flow state.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Yuying LiuDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7105-5311
Shuang LiDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.
Xuan TianDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-4983-209X
Thomas W LeungDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-8193-0709
Liping LiuDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
David S LiebeskindDepartment of Neurology, Neurovascular Imaging Research Core, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Xinyi LengDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China xinyi_leng@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0001-7300-6647
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKCapital Medical University · CNUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is a common cause of ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack (TIA) with a high recurrence rate. It is often referred to as intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS), when the plaque has caused significant narrowing of the vessel lumen. The lesion is usually considered 'symptomatic ICAD/ICAS' (sICAD/sICAS) when it has caused an ischaemic stroke or TIA. The severity of luminal stenosis has long been established as a prognostic factor for stroke relapse in sICAS. Yet, accumulating studies have also reported the important roles of plaque vulnerability, cerebral haemodynamics, collateral circulation, cerebral autoregulation and other factors in altering the stroke risks across patients with sICAS. In this review article, we focus on cerebral haemodynamics in sICAS. We reviewed imaging modalities/methods in assessing cerebral haemodynamics, the haemodynamic metrics provided by these methods and application of these methods in research and clinical practice. More importantly, we reviewed the significance of these haemodynamic features in governing the risk of stroke recurrence in sICAS. We also discussed other clinical implications of these haemodynamic features in sICAS, such as the associations with collateral recruitment and evolution of the lesion under medical treatment, and indications for more individualised blood pressure management for secondary stroke prevention. We then put forward some knowledge gaps and future directions on these topics.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaIntracranial ArteriosclerosisIschemic Attack, TransientIschemic StrokePlaque, AtheroscleroticStrokeConstriction, PathologicHemodynamicsHumansRisk Factorsatherosclerosisperfusionperfusion imagingstroke

Identifiers

PMID37094991
PMCPMC10800270
OpenAlexW4366817138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.