Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37094220›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

epiTCR: a highly sensitive predictor for TCR-peptide binding.

My-Diem Nguyen Pham, Thanh-Nhan Nguyen, Le Son Tran, Que-Tran Bui Nguyen, Thien-Phuc Hoang Nguyen, Thi Mong Quynh Pham, Hoai-Nghia Nguyen, Hoa Giang, Minh-Duy Phan, Vy Nguyen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Revised Adaptive Immune Receptor Data in the Immune Epitope Database.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

My-Diem Nguyen PhamMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0001-6200-3766
Thanh-Nhan NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Le Son TranMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Que-Tran Bui NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Thien-Phuc Hoang NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0002-8634-0326
Thi Mong Quynh PhamMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Hoai-Nghia NguyenNexCalibur Therapeutics, Wilmington, DE, United States.
Hoa GiangMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Minh-Duy PhanMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Vy NguyenMedical Genetics Institute, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.ORCID 0000-0003-3436-3662
Agricultural Genetics Institute · VNUniversity of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City · VN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationPredicting the binding between T-cell receptor (TCR) and peptide presented by human leucocyte antigen molecule is a highly challenging task and a key bottleneck in the development of immunotherapy. Existing prediction tools, despite exhibiting good performance on the datasets they were built with, suffer from low true positive rates when used to predict epitopes capable of eliciting T-cell responses in patients. Therefore, an improved tool for TCR-peptide prediction built upon a large dataset combining existing publicly available data is still needed.

resultsWe collected data from five public databases (IEDB, TBAdb, VDJdb, McPAS-TCR, and 10X) to form a dataset of >3 million TCR-peptide pairs, 3.27% of which were binding interactions. We proposed epiTCR, a Random Forest-based method dedicated to predicting the TCR-peptide interactions. epiTCR used simple input of TCR CDR3β sequences and antigen sequences, which are encoded by flattened BLOSUM62. epiTCR performed with area under the curve (0.98) and higher sensitivity (0.94) than other existing tools (NetTCR, Imrex, ATM-TCR, and pMTnet), while maintaining comparable prediction specificity (0.9). We identified seven epitopes that contributed to 98.67% of false positives predicted by epiTCR and exerted similar effects on other tools. We also demonstrated a considerable influence of peptide sequences on prediction, highlighting the need for more diverse peptides in a more balanced dataset. In conclusion, epiTCR is among the most well-performing tools, thanks to the use of combined data from public sources and its use will contribute to the quest in identifying neoantigens for precision cancer immunotherapy. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: epiTCR is available on GitHub (https://github.com/ddiem-ri-4D/epiTCR).

Indexed as

AntigensPeptidesEpitopesHumansReceptors, Antigen, T-CellT-LymphocytesAntigensEpitopesPeptidesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID37094220
PMCPMC10159657
OpenAlexW4366816229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.