Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37094141›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Estimating biotic integrity to capture existence value of freshwater ecosystems.

Ryan A Hill, Chris C Moore, Jessie M Doyle, Scott G Leibowitz, Paul L Ringold, Brenda Rashleigh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Biophysical Measures to Support Analysis and Communication of Existence Values.International review of environmental and resource economics · 2023
    Article
  5. Measuring the social benefits of water quality improvements to support regulatory objectives: Progress and future directions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Perspectives on valuing water quality improvements using stated preference methods.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ryan A HillCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, US EPA, Corvallis, OR 97333.ORCID 0000-0001-9583-0426
Chris C MooreNational Center for Environmental Economics, US EPA, Washington, DC 20004.
Jessie M DoyleOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Participant c/o US EPA, Corvallis, OR 97333.
Scott G LeibowitzCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, US EPA, Corvallis, OR 97333.ORCID 0000-0002-9955-9503
Paul L RingoldCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, US EPA, Corvallis, OR 97333.ORCID 0000-0003-4241-6613
Brenda RashleighOffice of Research and Development, US EPA, Narragansett, RI 02882.ORCID 0000-0002-0806-686X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) uses a water quality index (WQI) to estimate benefits of proposed Clean Water Act regulations. The WQI is relevant to human use value, such as recreation, but may not fully capture aspects of nonuse value, such as existence value. Here, we identify an index of biological integrity to supplement the WQI in a forthcoming national stated preference survey that seeks to capture existence value of streams and lakes more accurately within the conterminous United States (CONUS). We used literature and focus group research to evaluate aquatic indices regularly reported by the EPA's National Aquatic Resource Surveys. We chose an index that quantifies loss in biodiversity as the observed-to-expected (O/E) ratio of taxonomic composition because focus group participants easily understood its meaning and the environmental changes that would result in incremental improvements. However, available datasets of this index do not provide the spatial coverage to account for how conditions near survey respondents affect their willingness to pay for its improvement. Therefore, we modeled and interpolated the values of this index from sampled sites to 1.1 million stream segments and 297,071 lakes across the CONUS to provide the required coverage. The models explained 13 to 36% of the variation in O/E scores and demonstrate how modeling can provide data at the required density for benefits estimation. We close by discussing future work to improve performance of the models and to link biological condition with water quality and habitat models that will allow us to forecast changes resulting from regulatory options.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringHumansLakesRiversUnited StatesWater Qualitybiological integrityexistence valuelakesstated preferencestreams

Identifiers

PMID37094141
PMCPMC10161049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.