Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37094137›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Using the Veil of Ignorance to align AI systems with principles of justice.

Laura Weidinger, Kevin R McKee, Richard Everett, Saffron Huang, Tina O Zhu, Martin J Chadwick, Christopher Summerfield, Iason Gabriel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Statutory construction and interpretation for AI.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Perceptual interventions ameliorate statistical discrimination in learning agents.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Using the Veil of Ignorance to align AI systems with principles of justice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura WeidingerDeepMind, London N1C 4DN, United Kingdom.
Kevin R McKeeDeepMind, London N1C 4DN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4412-1686
Richard EverettDeepMind, London N1C 4DN, United Kingdom.
Saffron HuangDeepMind, London N1C 4DN, United Kingdom.
Tina O ZhuDeepMind, London N1C 4DN, United Kingdom.
Martin J ChadwickDeepMind, London N1C 4DN, United Kingdom.
Christopher SummerfieldDeepMind, London N1C 4DN, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2941-2653
Iason GabrielDeepMind, London N1C 4DN, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The philosopher John Rawls proposed the Veil of Ignorance (VoI) as a thought experiment to identify fair principles for governing a society. Here, we apply the VoI to an important governance domain: artificial intelligence (AI). In five incentive-compatible studies (

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSocietiesHumansSocial Justiceartificial intelligencedecision-makingethicsfairnesspolicymaking

Identifiers

PMID37094137
PMCPMC10160973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.