Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37094103›Full record

Observational studyAnesthesiology2023

Patient-, Clinician-, and Institution-level Variation in Inotrope Use for Cardiac Surgery: A Multicenter Observational Analysis.

Michael R Mathis, Allison M Janda, Sachin Kheterpal, Robert B Schonberger, Francis D Pagani, Milo C Engoren, Graciela B Mentz, Douglas C Shook, Jochen D Muehlschlegel, Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Anesthesiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Titrating Without a Safety Net.The American journal of nursing · 2026
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Michael R MathisDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Computational Bioinformatics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0002-9697-2212
Allison M JandaDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Sachin KheterpalDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Robert B SchonbergerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Francis D PaganiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Milo C EngorenDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Graciela B MentzDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Douglas C ShookDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jochen D MuehlschlegelDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group
Apple (Israel) · ILBrigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Cardiac Exosomes in myocardial Ischemic injuryR01HL150401 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MUEHLSCHLEGEL, JOCHEN DANIEL · 2020 to 2024
$3.3M
Cardiac sURgery anesthesia Best practices to reduce Acute Kidney Injury (CURB-AKI)R01DK133226 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Michael Robert Mathis, Karandeep Singh · 2022 to 2026
$3.3M
University of Michigan Anesthesiology Post-Doctoral Research Training ProgramT32GM103730 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Chad M Brummett, SACHIN KHETERPAL · 2014 to 2026
$1.9M
Anesthetic Induction Overdose Among Elderly Surgical PatientsR01AG059607 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHONBERGER, ROBERT · 2019 to 2022
$1.8M
Early Diagnosis of Heart Failure: A Perioperative Data-Driven ApproachK01HL141701 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MATHIS, MICHAEL ROBERT · 2018 to 2022
$862k
PHEnylephrine versus NOrepinephrine in Major NONcardiac surgery (PHENOMeNON): Foundational Studies for a Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial.K23HL166685 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Allison Mary Janda · 2023 to 2026
$689k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL141701NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL166685NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL150401NIA NIH HHS R01 AG059607NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK133226NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM103730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConflicting evidence exists regarding the risks and benefits of inotropic therapies during cardiac surgery, and the extent of variation in clinical practice remains understudied. Therefore, the authors sought to quantify patient-, anesthesiologist-, and hospital-related contributions to variation in inotrope use.

methodsIn this observational study, nonemergent adult cardiac surgeries using cardiopulmonary bypass were reviewed across a multicenter cohort of academic and community hospitals from 2014 to 2019. Patients who were moribund, receiving mechanical circulatory support, or receiving preoperative or home inotropes were excluded. The primary outcome was an inotrope infusion (epinephrine, dobutamine, milrinone, dopamine) administered for greater than 60 consecutive min intraoperatively or ongoing upon transport from the operating room. Institution-, clinician-, and patient-level variance components were studied.

resultsAmong 51,085 cases across 611 attending anesthesiologists and 29 hospitals, 27,033 (52.9%) cases received at least one intraoperative inotrope, including 21,796 (42.7%) epinephrine, 6,360 (12.4%) milrinone, 2,000 (3.9%) dobutamine, and 602 (1.2%) dopamine (non-mutually exclusive). Variation in inotrope use was 22.6% attributable to the institution, 6.8% attributable to the primary attending anesthesiologist, and 70.6% attributable to the patient. The adjusted median odds ratio for the same patient receiving inotropes was 1.73 between 2 randomly selected clinicians and 3.55 between 2 randomly selected institutions. Factors most strongly associated with increased likelihood of inotrope use were institutional medical school affiliation (adjusted odds ratio, 6.2; 95% CI, 1.39 to 27.8), heart failure (adjusted odds ratio, 2.60; 95% CI, 2.46 to 2.76), pulmonary circulation disorder (adjusted odds ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.58 to 1.87), loop diuretic home medication (adjusted odds ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.42 to 1.69), Black race (adjusted odds ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.68), and digoxin home medication (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.86).

conclusionsVariation in inotrope use during cardiac surgery is attributable to the institution and to the clinician, in addition to the patient. Variation across institutions and clinicians suggests a need for future quantitative and qualitative research to understand variation in inotrope use affecting outcomes and develop evidence-based, patient-centered inotrope therapies. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE:

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresCardiotonic AgentsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDobutamineDopamineEpinephrineFemaleHumansIntraoperative CareMaleMiddle AgedMilrinoneMyocardial ContractionCardiotonic AgentsDobutamineDopamineEpinephrineMilrinone

Identifiers

PMID37094103
PMCPMC10524016
OpenAlexW4366817366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.