ArticleGenome biology and evolution2023
Tackling the Pangenome Dilemma Requires the Concerted Analysis of Multiple Population Genetic Processes.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A generative model for bipartite gene-sharing networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Precision engineering of upstream open reading frames for translational regulation and crop improvement.Frontiers in genome editing · 2026Review
- Gene co-occurrence and its association with phage infectivity in bacterial pangenomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Persistent, Private, and Mobile Genes: A Model for Gene Dynamics in Evolving Pangenomes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Large-scale investigation of species-specific orphan genes in the human gut microbiome elucidates their evolutionary origins.Genome research · 2024Article
- Evolutionary dynamics of the accessory genomes ofmSphere · 2024Article
- A universal and constant rate of gene content change traces pangenome flux to LUCA.FEMS microbiology letters · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pangenome is the set of all genes present in a prokaryotic population. Most pangenomes contain many accessory genes of low and intermediate frequencies. Different population genetics processes contribute to the shape of these pangenomes, namely selection and fitness-independent processes such as gene transfer, gene loss, and migration. However, their relative importance is unknown and highly debated. Here, we argue that the debate around prokaryotic pangenomes arose due to the imprecise application of population genetics models. Most importantly, two different processes of horizontal gene transfer act on prokaryotic populations, which are frequently confused, despite their fundamentally different behavior. Genes acquired from distantly related organisms (termed here acquiring gene transfer) are most comparable to mutation in nucleotide sequences. In contrast, gene gain within the population (termed here spreading gene transfer) has an effect on gene frequencies that is identical to the effect of positive selection on single genes. We thus show that selection and fitness-independent population genetic processes affecting pangenomes are indistinguishable at the level of single gene dynamics. Nevertheless, population genetics processes are fundamentally different when considering the joint distribution of all accessory genes across individuals of a population. We propose that, to understand to which degree the different processes shaped pangenome diversity, the development of comprehensive models and simulation tools is mandatory. Furthermore, we need to identify summary statistics and measurable features that can distinguish between the processes, where considering the joint distribution of accessory genes across individuals of a population will be particularly relevant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.