Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37093947›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and technology2023

Comparison of pork belly characteristics and weights of primal cuts between gilt and barrow of Landrace × Yorkshire × Duroc pigs measured by AutoFomIII.

Eunyoung Ko, Yunhwan Park, Kwangwook Park, Changhyun Woo, Jaeyoung Kim, Kwansuk Kim, Jungseok Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eunyoung KoDodram Pig Farmers Cooperative, Icheon 17405, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8686-1762
Yunhwan ParkDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2239-6697
Kwangwook ParkDodram Pig Farmers Cooperative, Icheon 17405, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2671-0687
Changhyun WooDodram Pig Farmers Cooperative, Icheon 17405, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8103-9817
Jaeyoung KimDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2847-1731
Kwansuk KimDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5895-4398
Jungseok ChoiDepartment of Animal Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8033-0410

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, pigs breed in Korea are LYD (Landrace × Yorkshire × Duroc) crossbred pigs. Pigs used as fresh meat are gilts and barrows. However, the current supply of pork is not satisfying Korean consumers. In addition, the comparison of carcasses between gilts and barrows only studies carcass weight, backfat thickness, or meat quality, and there are very few studies comparing carcass characteristics. The purpose of this study was to compare characteristics of 7 primal cuts of gilts and barrows as measured by AutoFom III. A total of 350,179 pigs were used, including 176,461 gilts and 173,718 barrows. Characteristics of seven primal cuts were measured using AutoFom III. In the case of carcass weight, there was no significant difference in grade 1+. For all other survey items except for grade 2, gilts showed significantly (

Indexed as

AutoFom IIIBarrowBellyGiltGradeLandrace × Yorkshire × Duroc (LYD)

Identifiers

PMID37093947
PMCPMC10119445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.