ReviewJournal of animal science and technology2023
Breeding potential for pork belly to the novel economic trait.
Review in Journal of animal science and technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fat Level and Excessive Fat Percentage of Retail-Ready Pork Belly Slices by Quality Grade.Food science of animal resources · 2025Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study for Belly Traits in Canadian Commercial Crossbred Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- The vision of big data recirculation for smart livestock farming in South Korea.Journal of animal science and technology · 2025Review
- Quality Variation of Pork Bellies by Cutting Manner and Quality Grade.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Effects of Genotype on Pig Carcass, Meat Quality and Consumer Sensory Evaluation of Loins and Bellies.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The results of meat quality traits and sensory characteristics according to the concentration of androstenone in uncastrated pigs.Journal of animal science and technology · 2024Article
- Ambivalence towards pork belly: exploring its significance and contradictions from the perspectives of the food industry and nutritional science.Food science and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Study on the current research trends and future agenda in animal products: an Asian perspective.Journal of animal science and technology · 2023Review
- Estimation of genetic parameters for pork belly traits.Animal bioscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pork is known as one of the preferred part of meat worldwide. Especially, the belly, known as 'Samgyeopsal'in South Korea, has been preferred by consumers in South Korea. Pork belly contained various component muscles, intermuscular and subcutaneous fat. The high-fat belly cut (containing 50%-60% fat ratio) has a low preference in South Korea whereas, the standard belly cut (20%-40% fat ratio) of the consumer preference was different. In addition, the evaluation system focused on lean meat production, represented by loin eye area and back fat thickness. In this review, we discussed the pork belly structure, phenotypic correlation with lean meat production ability and meat quality, and genetic potential to confirm to possibility of application to pig breeding. Moreover, the confirmed possibilities considered that could be a base on the evaluation of standard for the pork belly as an economic trait.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.