Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37093901›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science and technology2023

Differences in bedding material could alter the growth performance of White Pekin ducks raised for 42 days.

Elijah Ogola Oketch, Yu Bin Kim, Myunghwan Yu, Jun Seon Hong, Shan Randima Nawarathne, Jung Min Heo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science and technology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elijah Ogola OketchDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4364-460X
Yu Bin KimDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7720-128X
Myunghwan YuDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4479-4677
Jun Seon HongDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2142-9888
Shan Randima NawarathneDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9055-9155
Jung Min HeoDepartment of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3693-1320

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of different commercially available bedding materials on the growth performance and carcass characteristics of ducks for 42 days was investigated. 336 one-day-old White-Pekin ducklings (60.48 ± 0.16 g) were randomly allocated into 24-floor pens with one of the three beddings namely i) coco peat, ii) rice husks, or iii) sawdust. 14 ducklings per pen and 8 replicate pens per bedding material were used. Birds were fed a starter diet from days 1-21 and a grower diet from days 22-42. Weekly growth performance evaluation was conducted for the average body weight, weight gains, daily feed intake, and feed conversion efficiency. One bird per pen was sacrificed on day 42 for the evaluation of carcass characteristics including the carcass, breast, and leg muscle percentages. Breast and leg muscle samples were then collected and analyzed for their proximate and pH values. Higher body weights (p < 0.05) were noticed with rice husks on day 42 only. Improved daily gains (

Indexed as

BeddingCarcassCoco peatGrowth performanceRice husksSawdust

Identifiers

PMID37093901
PMCPMC10119447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.