Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37093841›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Health worker perspectives on access to antenatal care in rural plains Nepal during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Bibhu Thapaliya, Samata Kumari Yadav, Sanju Bhattarai, Santosh Giri, Suprich Sapkota, Abriti Arjyal, Helen Harris-Fry, Naomi Saville, Sara Hillman, Sushil Baral and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bibhu ThapaliyaHERD International, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Samata Kumari YadavHERD International, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Sanju BhattaraiHERD International, Lalitpur, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0003-4246-9117
Santosh GiriHERD International, Lalitpur, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-5186-7814
Suprich SapkotaHERD International, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Abriti ArjyalHERD International, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Helen Harris-FryLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2367-908X
Naomi SavilleUCL Institute for Global Health 30 Guilford Street, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1735-3684
Sara HillmanUCL Institute for Women's Health Room 237c Medical School Building, London, United Kingdom.
Sushil BaralHERD International, Lalitpur, Nepal.ORCID 0000-0002-3425-6915
Joanna MorrisonUCL Institute for Global Health 30 Guilford Street, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9241-8863
Nepal Development Research Institute · NPUniversity College London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBLondon Women's Clinic · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MRC/RO20485/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 210894/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic affected access to antenatal care in low and middle-income countries where anaemia in pregnancy is prevalent. We analyse how health workers provided antenatal care and the factors affecting access to antenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Kapilvastu district in the western plains of Nepal. We used qualitative and quantitative methodologies, conducting eight semi-structured interviews with health workers who provided antenatal care during the pandemic, and a questionnaire containing open and closed questions with 52 female community health volunteers. Antenatal care was severely disrupted during the pandemic. Health workers had to find ways to provide care with insufficient personal protective equipment and guidance whilst facing extreme levels of stigmatisation which prevented them from providing outreach services. Pregnant women were fearful or unable to visit health institutions during the pandemic because of COVID-19 control measures. Pre-pandemic and during the pandemic health workers tried to contact pregnant and postpartum women and families over the phone, but this was challenging because of limited access to phones, and required pregnant women to make at least one antenatal care visit to give their phone number. The pandemic prevented new pregnancies from being registered, and therefore the possibilities to provide services over the phone for these pregnancies were limited. To reach the most marginalised during a pandemic or other health emergency, health volunteers and households need to exchange phone numbers, enabling proactive monitoring and care-seeking. Strengthening procurement and coordination between the municipal, provincial, and federal levels of government is needed to ensure adequacy of antenatal supplies, such as iron folic acid tablets, in health emergencies. Community engagement is important to ensure women and families are aware of the need to access antenatal care and iron folic acid, and to address stigmatisation of health workers.

Indexed as

COVID-19Prenatal CareFemaleFolic AcidHumansIronNepalPandemicsPregnancyFolic AcidIron

Identifiers

PMID37093841
PMCPMC10124848
OpenAlexW4366819334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.