Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37093820›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Taxonomic identification accuracy from BOLD and GenBank databases using over a thousand insect DNA barcodes from Colombia.

Nathalie Baena-Bejarano, Catalina Reina, Diego Esteban Martínez-Revelo, Claudia A Medina, Eduardo Tovar, Sandra Uribe-Soto, Jhon Cesar Neita-Moreno, Mailyn A Gonzalez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nathalie Baena-BejaranoInstituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0003-0003-0448
Catalina ReinaICA-Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario, Soledad, Atlántico, Colombia.
Diego Esteban Martínez-ReveloAsociación GAICA, Pasto, Nariño, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-4446-4902
Claudia A MedinaInstituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia.
Eduardo TovarInstituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia.
Sandra Uribe-SotoGrupo de Investigación en Sistemática Molecular, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Medellín, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia.
Jhon Cesar Neita-MorenoInstituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia.
Mailyn A GonzalezInstituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent declines of insect populations at high rates have resulted in the need to develop a quick method to determine their diversity and to process massive data for the identification of species of highly diverse groups. A short sequence of DNA from COI is widely used for insect identification by comparing it against sequences of known species. Repositories of sequences are available online with tools that facilitate matching of the sequences of interest to a known individual. However, the performance of these tools can differ. Here we aim to assess the accuracy in identification of insect taxonomic categories from two repositories, BOLD Systems and GenBank. This was done by comparing the sequence matches between the taxonomist identification and the suggested identification from the platforms. We used 1,160 COI sequences representing eight orders of insects from Colombia. After the comparison, we reanalyzed the results from a representative subset of the data from the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera). Overall, BOLD systems outperformed GenBank, and the performance of both engines differed by orders and other taxonomic categories (species, genus and family). Higher rates of accurate identification were obtained at family and genus levels. The accuracy was higher in BOLD for the order Coleoptera at family level, for Coleoptera and Lepidoptera at genus and species level. Other orders performed similarly in both repositories. Moreover, the Scarabaeinae subset showed that species were correctly identified only when BOLD match percentage was above 93.4% and a total of 85% of the samples were correctly assigned to a taxonomic category. These results accentuate the great potential of the identification engines to place insects accurately into their respective taxonomic categories based on DNA barcodes and highlight the reliability of BOLD Systems for insect identification in the absence of a large reference database for a highly diverse country.

Indexed as

ColeopteraDatabases, Nucleic AcidAnimalsColombiaDNADNA Barcoding, TaxonomicInsectaPhylogenyReproducibility of ResultsDNA

Identifiers

PMID37093820
PMCPMC10124890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.