Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37093790›Full record

ReviewPLOS global public health2023

Theories for interventions to reduce physical and verbal abuse: A mixed methods review of the health and social care literature to inform future maternity care.

Soo Downe, Rebecca Nowland, Andrew Clegg, Naseerah Akooji, Cath Harris, Alan Farrier, Lisa Tanyaradzwa Gondo, Kenny Finlayson, Gill Thomson, Carol Kingdon and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Soo DowneResearch in Childbirth and Health Group, THRIVE Centre, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2848-2550
Rebecca NowlandMaternal and Infant Nurture and Nutrition Group, THRIVE Centre, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4326-2425
Andrew CleggSynthesis, Economic Evaluations and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Naseerah AkoojiLancashire Clinical Trials Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Cath HarrisSynthesis, Economic Evaluations and Decision Science (SEEDS) Group, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7763-830X
Alan FarrierHealthy and Sustainable Settings Unit, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4989-2209
Lisa Tanyaradzwa GondoSchool of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Kenny FinlaysonResearch in Childbirth and Health Group, THRIVE Centre, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1287-7630
Gill ThomsonMaternal and Infant Nurture and Nutrition Group, THRIVE Centre, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Carol KingdonResearch in Childbirth and Health Group, THRIVE Centre, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5958-9257
Hedieh MehrtashUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4991-616X
Rebekah McCrimmonSchool of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom.
Özge TunçalpUNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5370-682X

Funding

Addressing Provider Stress and Unconscious Bias to Improve Quality of Maternal Health CareR00HD093798 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI AFULANI, PATIENCE A · 2020 to 2022
$737k
NICHD NIH HHS R00 HD093798World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite global attention, physical and verbal abuse remains prevalent in maternity and newborn healthcare. We aimed to establish theoretical principles for interventions to reduce such abuse. We undertook a mixed methods systematic review of health and social care literature (MEDLINE, SocINDEX, Global Index Medicus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Sept 29th 2020 and March 22nd 2022: no date or language restrictions). Papers that included theory were analysed narratively. Those with suitable outcome measures were meta-analysed. We used convergence results synthesis to integrate findings. In September 2020, 193 papers were retained (17,628 hits). 154 provided theoretical explanations; 38 were controlled studies. The update generated 39 studies (2695 hits), plus five from reference lists (12 controlled studies). A wide range of explicit and implicit theories were proposed. Eleven non-maternity controlled studies could be meta-analysed, but only for physical restraint, showing little intervention effect. Most interventions were multi-component. Synthesis suggests that a combination of systems level and behavioural change models might be effective. The maternity intervention studies could all be mapped to this approach. Two particular adverse contexts emerged; social normalisation of violence across the socio-ecological system, especially for 'othered' groups; and the belief that mistreatment is necessary to minimise clinical harm. The ethos and therefore the expression of mistreatment at each level of the system is moderated by the individuals who enact the system, through what they feel they can control, what is socially normal, and what benefits them in that context. Interventions to reduce verbal and physical abuse in maternity care should be locally tailored, and informed by theories encompassing all socio-ecological levels, and the psychological and emotional responses of individuals working within them. Attention should be paid to social normalisation of violence against 'othered' groups, and to the belief that intrapartum maternal mistreatment can optimise safe outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID37093790
PMCPMC10124898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.