Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37093783›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2023

Consensus-building during the Becoming Breastfeeding Friendly (BBF) initiative in Samoa: A qualitative content analysis.

Katherine Daiy, Kendall Arslanian, Courtney Choy, Analosa Manuele-Magele, Christina Soti-Ulberg, Amber Hromi-Fiedler, Nicola Hawley, Rafael Pérez-Escamilla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nurturing Bonds: A Qualitative Exploration of Breastfeeding and Responsive Feeding Practices in Samoan Mother-Infants Dyads.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katherine DaiyDepartment of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6569-7361
Kendall ArslanianDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6763-2163
Courtney ChoyDepartment of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6870-4384
Analosa Manuele-MageleMinistry of Health, Apia, Samoa.
Christina Soti-UlbergMinistry of Health, Apia, Samoa.
Amber Hromi-FiedlerDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Nicola HawleyDepartment of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Rafael Pérez-EscamillaDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9416-8039

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Becoming Breastfeeding Friendly (BBF) initiative provides countries with an evidence-based toolbox to improve the national breastfeeding environment by assessing and developing a plan to effectively scale up well-coordinated national policies and programs. BBF is carried out by a multi-institutional, intersectoral committee of experts, convening across five committee meetings designed to produce policy recommendations that can be implemented in the country's context. Samoa successfully completed the BBF initiative in 2018, resulting in the institution of breastfeeding policy in hospitals and the establishment of lactation rooms within government ministries. An important step in informing the success of future breastfeeding scale-up initiatives is understanding how consensus is built. This study aimed to investigate how the BBF Samoa committee built consensus. We conducted a content analysis of audio recordings of three BBF Samoa meetings (meetings 1, 2 and 4), meeting minutes, and meeting notes using an a priori operational consensus-building framework. We used a combination of deductive and inductive approaches to: a) evaluate the data against existing, a priori criteria for consensus-building and b) identify emergent ways in which the BBF Samoa committee may have achieved consensus. We identified 6 themes, 2 meta-subthemes, and 16 subthemes. The 6 themes, largely defined by the a priori framework, represented key components of successful consensus-building. The 2 meta-subthemes described two overarching methods of consensus-building: "process-led" (i.e., inherent to the BBF process itself) and "organic" (unique/specific to the committee). Lastly, the 16 subthemes described more specific ways that the committee reached consensus. The detailed manualization of the BBF process, its reliance on data, and its transparent and engaged committee process were key for reaching consensus on BBF scores and recommendations in Samoa. Our study contributes to the understanding of how effective breastfeeding policy recommendations are made, using a methodology that can be applied beyond the topic of breastfeeding.

Identifiers

PMID37093783
PMCPMC10124882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.