ArticleCancer genomics & proteomics
A Multiplex Biomarker Assay Improves the Prediction of Survival in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.
Article in Cancer genomics & proteomics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationship Between the Levels of 91 Circulating Inflammatory Proteins and Ovarian-Related Diseases: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Serum protein profiling reveals an inflammation signature as a predictor of early breast cancer survival.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2024Article
- A Targeted Proteomics Approach Reveals a Serum Protein Signature as a Diagnostic Biomarker for Colorectal Cancer.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimEpithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is usually diagnosed in advanced stages and has a high mortality rate. In this study, we used the proximity extension assay from Olink Proteomics to search for new plasma protein biomarkers to predict overall survival (OS) in patients with EOC. MATERIALS AND
methodsPeripheral blood samples were obtained preoperatively from 116 EOC patients undergoing primary debulking surgery: 28 early EOC cases (FIGO stage I-II) and 88 advanced EOC cases (FIGO stage III-IV). Proteins were measured using the Olink Oncology II and Inflammation panels. In total, 177 unique protein biomarkers were analysed. Cross-validation and LASSO regression were combined to select prediction models for OS.
resultsThe model including age and the three-biomarker combination of neurotrophin-3 (NT-3)+transmembrane glycoprotein NMB (GPNMB)+mesothelin (MSLN) predicted worse OS with AUC=0.79 (p=0.004). Adding cancer antigen 125 (CA125) and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) to the model further improved performance (AUC=0.83; p=0.003). In a postoperative model including age and stage (III+IV vs. I+II), the three-biomarker panel of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 28 (CCL28)+T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma protein 1A (TCL1A)+GPNMB improved the prediction of OS (from AUC=0.83 to AUC=0.90; p=0.05). In the postoperative model including age and dichotomized stage (III vs. I+II), the biomarkers CCL28 and GPNMB1 improved the prediction of OS (AUC=0.86; p<0.001). The combination of high levels of both CA125 and HE4 predicted worse survival (p=0.05).
conclusionIn this explorative study evaluating the performance of plasma protein biomarkers in predicting OS, we found that adding biomarkers, especially NT-3, to the panel improved the prediction of OS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.