Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37093634›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2023

A Medicoeconomic Evaluation of a Telehealth Platform for Elective Outpatient Surgeries: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Florian Robin, Maxim Roy, Alexandre Kuftedjian, Laurelie Perret, Frédéric Lavoie, Alexandre Castonguay, Marie-Pascale Pomey, Cedrick Zaouter, Guy Pare

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04948632 (A Medico-Economic Evaluation of a Telehealth Platform for Elective Outpatient Surgeries), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04948632 nacompletednot on this map

A Medico-Economic Evaluation of a Telehealth Platform for Elective Outpatient Surgeries: a Trial Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)Ran2022 to 2024Enrolled1,000ConditionsSurgery--Complications, Patient Satisfaction, Quality of LifeArmsComplete LeoMed application, Basic LeoMed application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Florian RobinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5813-1164
Maxim RoyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0387-2395
Alexandre KuftedjianDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0401-8713
Laurelie PerretDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9988-0399
Frédéric LavoieResearch Center, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7061-1032
Alexandre CastonguayÉcole des Hautes Études Commerciales, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7102-9893
Marie-Pascale PomeyResearch Center, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5180-8139
Cedrick ZaouterDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8202-0395
Guy PareÉcole des Hautes Études Commerciales, Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7425-1994
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal · CAHEC Montréal · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of elective outpatient surgeries in Canada has increased markedly in the last 10 years. However, unanticipated cancellations on the day of surgery and adverse postoperative events are frequent. Modern technologies have been shown to be of great help in the medical field in improving patient care. Thus, it is likely that dedicated technologies could also significantly improve surgical outpatients' pathways. Therefore, the department of anesthesiology at the University of Montreal Medical Center, in collaboration with LeoMed, a telemedicine platform, has developed a telehealth solution to offer more efficient perioperative support and follow-up for patients undergoing ambulatory surgery.

objectiveThe objective is to evaluate the medicoeconomic benefit of a dedicated perioperative telehealth platform for patients undergoing day surgery. Our hypothesis is that this dedicated telecare solution will allow more efficient patient care, which will reduce all types of medical costs related to day surgery pathways.

methodsThis study is a single-center, single-blinded, 2-group randomized controlled trial. One thousand patients aged over 18 years with internet access who are scheduled to undergo ambulatory surgery will be enrolled and randomized either to follow a perioperative path that includes a patient-tailored perioperative digital app via the LeoMed telecare platform for 1 month or to follow the standard of care, which does not offer personalized digital support. The primary outcome will be to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the telecare platform, assessing direct costs from factors such as unanticipated cancellations on the day of surgery due to preoperative instructions not being followed, calls to the local health information line, calls to the provincial health information line, emergency department consultations, unplanned readmissions, or medical visits for problems related to the surgical procedure within the first 30 days after the intervention. The secondary outcome will be to evaluate cost utility using a questionnaire assessing quality-adjusted life years. A blinded independent research team will analyze outcomes. All data will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. A sample size of 500 subjects in each group was calculated to detect a 21% reduction in postoperative complications with a power of 90%. This study has been approved by the ethics board of Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (University of Montreal Health Centre). No employee of LeoMed was involved in the study conception, and none will be involved in either data collection or analysis.

resultsResults of this trial will be useful to determine the economic benefit of a telecare platform specifically developed for surgical outpatient pathways.

conclusionsWe believe that the deployment of a dedicated perioperative telehealth app will lead to better patient care and fewer postoperative complications, which will lower all types of costs related to surgical outpatient care.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04948632; https://ClinicalTrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04948632. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/44006.

Indexed as

costcost-effectivenessdevelopmentoutpatient surgerypatientplatformqualitysafetysupportsurgerytechnologiestelecaretelehealthtelehealth solution

Identifiers

PMID37093634
PMCPMC10167590
OpenAlexW4321384850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.