ArticleJAMA network open2023
Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Analysis of Statin-Related Topics and Sentiments on Social Media.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Improving self-care behaviors in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease using a knowledge-based intelligent self-care system: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Large Language Model-Based Analysis of Statin Therapy Discussions and Sentiment on Social Media: Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Observational
- Inaccurate information regarding cardiovascular disease prevention enabled by generative artificial intelligence.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Large Language Modeling-Enabled Analysis of Atrial Fibrillation on Social Media.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Identifying barriers to human papillomavirus vaccination in China: a topic modelling analysis of social media (2018-2024).BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Effect of a generative artificial intelligence digital scribe on pediatric provider documentation time, cognitive burden, and burnout.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Reasons for non-acceptance of statin therapy by patients at high cardiovascular risk.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence tools in supporting healthcare professionals for tailored patient care.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Evolutionary Trend of Dental Health Care Information on Chinese Social Media Platforms During 2018-2022: Retrospective Observational Study.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Observational
- Industry Payments and Sentiments Toward Robotic Surgery Among US Physicians.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Article
- Statin Use and Hyperglycemia: Do Statins Cause Diabetes?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024Review
- BCG therapy for bladder cancer: Exploring patient experiences and concerns through artificial intelligence-based social media analysis.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- Trends in Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Social Media Posts Using Artificial Intelligence.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Health Inequities in Dietary Interventions on Atherosclerosis: A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2024Review
- Using large language models to assess public perceptions around glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on social media.Communications medicine · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Is it Ready for Prime Time?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024Review
- Applicability of Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Clinical Lipidology: A Narrative Review.Journal of lipid and atherosclerosis · 2024Review
- Social Media Posts on Statins: What Can We Learn About Patient Experiences and Perspectives?Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Despite compelling evidence that statins are safe, are generally well tolerated, and reduce cardiovascular events, statins are underused even in patients with the highest risk. Social media may provide contemporary insights into public perceptions about statins. Objective: To characterize and classify public perceptions about statins that were gleaned from more than a decade of statin-related discussions on Reddit, a widely used social media platform. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study analyzed all statin-related discussions on the social media platform that were dated between January 1, 2009, and July 12, 2022. Statin- and cholesterol-focused communities, were identified to create a list of statin-related discussions. An artificial intelligence (AI) pipeline was developed to cluster these discussions into specific topics and overarching thematic groups. The pipeline consisted of a semisupervised natural language processing model (BERT [Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers]), a dimensionality reduction technique, and a clustering algorithm. The sentiment for each discussion was labeled as positive, neutral, or negative using a pretrained BERT model. Exposures: Statin-related posts and comments containing the terms statin and cholesterol. Main Outcomes and Measures: Statin-related topics and thematic groups. Results: A total of 10 233 unique statin-related discussions (961 posts and 9272 comments) from 5188 unique authors were identified. The number of statin-related discussions increased by a mean (SD) of 32.9% (41.1%) per year. A total of 100 discussion topics were identified and were classified into 6 overarching thematic groups: (1) ketogenic diets, diabetes, supplements, and statins; (2) statin adverse effects; (3) statin hesitancy; (4) clinical trial appraisals; (5) pharmaceutical industry bias and statins; and (6) red yeast rice and statins. The sentiment analysis revealed that most discussions had a neutral (66.6%) or negative (30.8%) sentiment. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study demonstrated the potential of an AI approach to analyze large, contemporary, publicly available social media data and generate insights into public perceptions about statins. This information may help guide strategies for addressing barriers to statin use and adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.