Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37093597›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Analysis of Statin-Related Topics and Sentiments on Social Media.

Sulaiman Somani, Marieke Meija van Buchem, Ashish Sarraju, Tina Hernandez-Boussard, Fatima Rodriguez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Statin Use and Hyperglycemia: Do Statins Cause Diabetes?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sulaiman SomaniDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Marieke Meija van BuchemDepartment of Information Technology & Digital Innovation, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands.
Ashish SarrajuDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Tina Hernandez-BoussardDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Fatima RodriguezDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Stanford University · USCardiovascular Institute of the South · USCleveland Clinic · USLeiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

SURPASS: (Statin Use and Risk Prediction of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in minority Subgroups)K01HL144607 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI RODRIGUEZ, FATIMA · 2019 to 2023
$856k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL144607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Despite compelling evidence that statins are safe, are generally well tolerated, and reduce cardiovascular events, statins are underused even in patients with the highest risk. Social media may provide contemporary insights into public perceptions about statins. Objective: To characterize and classify public perceptions about statins that were gleaned from more than a decade of statin-related discussions on Reddit, a widely used social media platform. Design, Setting, and Participants: This qualitative study analyzed all statin-related discussions on the social media platform that were dated between January 1, 2009, and July 12, 2022. Statin- and cholesterol-focused communities, were identified to create a list of statin-related discussions. An artificial intelligence (AI) pipeline was developed to cluster these discussions into specific topics and overarching thematic groups. The pipeline consisted of a semisupervised natural language processing model (BERT [Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers]), a dimensionality reduction technique, and a clustering algorithm. The sentiment for each discussion was labeled as positive, neutral, or negative using a pretrained BERT model. Exposures: Statin-related posts and comments containing the terms statin and cholesterol. Main Outcomes and Measures: Statin-related topics and thematic groups. Results: A total of 10 233 unique statin-related discussions (961 posts and 9272 comments) from 5188 unique authors were identified. The number of statin-related discussions increased by a mean (SD) of 32.9% (41.1%) per year. A total of 100 discussion topics were identified and were classified into 6 overarching thematic groups: (1) ketogenic diets, diabetes, supplements, and statins; (2) statin adverse effects; (3) statin hesitancy; (4) clinical trial appraisals; (5) pharmaceutical industry bias and statins; and (6) red yeast rice and statins. The sentiment analysis revealed that most discussions had a neutral (66.6%) or negative (30.8%) sentiment. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study demonstrated the potential of an AI approach to analyze large, contemporary, publicly available social media data and generate insights into public perceptions about statins. This information may help guide strategies for addressing barriers to statin use and adherence.

Indexed as

Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsSocial MediaArtificial IntelligenceAttitudeCholesterolHumansCholesterolHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID37093597
PMCPMC10126874
OpenAlexW4366820179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.