ArticleDermatology practical & conceptual2023
Analysis of Teledermoscopy and Face-to-Face Examination of Atypical Pigmented Lesions: a Cross-Sectional, Retrospective Study.
Article in Dermatology practical & conceptual, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of teledermatology for skin diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Novel Optical Imaging Techniques for Melanoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of dermatology · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Teledermatology vs. Face-to-Face Dermatology for the Diagnosis of Melanoma: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing Skin Cancer Triage: The Role of Patient-Initiated Teledermoscopy in Remote Diagnosis.Cancers · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMalignant melanoma (MM) is one of the most fatal skin cancers. Early detection and treatment are crucial for metastasis prevention. The growing number of MM cases has led to an increased need for skin examinations, increasing the healthcare demand in dermatology departments.
objectivesThe purpose of this cross-sectional, retrospective study was to analyze the accuracy and reliability of two different methods, teledermoscopy (TD) and face-to-face examination (FTF), with two different patient groups for MM detection in Jönköping County.
methodsIn teledermoscopic evaluation, a general practitioner takes photographs of a suspected skin lesion (clinical and dermoscopic images) and sends TD referrals to a dermatologist for digital assessment. In the FTF group, the diagnosis was made during regular clinical visits to the dermatology department by a dermatologist.
resultsThe TD group comprised 55 women and 57 men, and an FTF group comprised 72 women and 66 men. Based on the histopathology report, in the TD group, 75% of suspected MM lesions were accurately classified as MM compared with 57% of suspected MM lesions correctly diagnosed in the FTF group. When compared with histopathology report, the diagnostic concordance of TD and FTF examinations were 80% and 69%, respectively.
conclusionsWe report a high diagnostic concordance between TD and the final histopathological diagnosis. Metrics analyzed for diagnostic accuracy confirmed that TD is an effective and accurate method for early diagnosis of MM. TD is suitable, non-inferior and a useful alternative to FTF examination.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.