ArticleJournal of community genetics2023
A review of key terminology and definitions used for birth defects globally.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Opportunities and Challenges for Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies in Sub-Saharan Africa.Birth defects research · 2026Article
- Article
- The effect of a family-centered care program on the psychological outcomes of births with congenital malformations: A study protocol.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Newborn screening and referral for congenital anomalies by lay health workers in Pakistan: a mixed-methods study to evaluate the effectiveness of a co-created educational intervention.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Associations between season of conception and maternal and perinatal health: a prospective birth cohort study.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Impact of major congenital anomalies on preterm birth and low birth weight.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Epidemiology of congenital anomalies in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Neural tube defects in a war-torn Tigray regional state of Ethiopia: a retrospective study of 54,626 deliveries.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Birth defects reporting and surveillance in India: a narrative review.Journal of community genetics · 2025Review
- The impact of major congenital anomalies on obstetric outcomes in the United Arab Emirates: the Mutaba'ah Study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Beliefs and perceptions towards congenital anomalies in Dilla town, Gedeo Zone, Southern Ethiopia; a qualitative study.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Live birth prevalence of major congenital anomalies in the United Arab Emirates.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Action against birth defects: if not now, when?Global health action · 2024Article
- A Capacity Audit of Medical Geneticists and Genetic Counsellors in South Africa, 2024: A National Crisis.Genes · 2024Article
- Safety surveillance for PrEP in pregnant and breastfeeding women.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Birth defects, also known as congenital disorders, are a significant health issue impacting at least five million births annually worldwide. For policymakers to mount a relevant healthcare response to care for those affected, the burden of disease of these conditions must be quantified. Estimates of the contribution of birth defects to under-5 child mortality and morbidity are generated by several groups globally. These estimates often differ, causing confusion for policymakers. While some differences may be attributed to the data sources and methods used, much is due to a lack of clarity in the terminology used for the group of disorders classed as "congenital". This study aimed to gain insight into the diversity of terms and definitions for birth defects, including those used routinely by relevant international/national organisations and in the peer-reviewed literature. This two-part study included (1) scoping review of peer-reviewed literature to identify terms and definitions in use for birth defects and (2) review of key websites and grey literature to identify terms and definitions used. The results of this study indicate a wide variety of terms being used, often interchangeably and undefined, in peer-reviewed publications, on institutional websites and related literature. This suggests a lack of clarity related to terminology and sets the scene for further discussion, recommending that the community of practice working on birth defects comes to a consensus on standard terminology and definitions for global uptake and implementation. Such standardisation will facilitate a common understanding of the burden of these disorders globally, regionally and within countries so that action can be taken to support affected children and their families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.