Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37093502›Full record

Observational studyThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2024

Generating EQ-5D-3L health utility scores from the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: a perinatal mapping study.

Elizabeth M Camacho, Gemma E Shields, Carolyn A Chew-Graham, Emily Eisner, Simon Gilbody, Elizabeth Littlewood, Dean McMillan, Kylie Watson, Pasco Fearon, Deborah J Sharp

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elizabeth M CamachoSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK. elizabeth.camacho@manchester.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9574-7710
Gemma E ShieldsSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
Carolyn A Chew-GrahamSchool of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.
Emily EisnerSchool of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, UK.
Simon GilbodyHull York Medical School and Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Elizabeth LittlewoodDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Dean McMillanHull York Medical School and Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Kylie WatsonManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Pasco FearonResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Deborah J SharpCentre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

Research for Patient Benefit Programme NIHR203474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerinatal depression (PND) describes depression experienced by parents during pregnancy or in the first year after a baby is born. The EQ-5D instrument (a generic measure of health status) is not often collected in perinatal research, however disease-specific measures, such as the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) are widely used. Mapping can be used to estimate generic health utility index values from disease-specific measures like the EPDS.

objectiveTo develop a mapping algorithm to estimate EQ-5D utility index values from the EPDS.

methodsPatient-level data from the BaBY PaNDA study (English observational cohort study) provided 1068 observations with paired EPDS and EQ-5D (3-level version; EQ-5D-3L) responses. We compared the performance of six alternative regression model types, each with four specifications of covariates (EPDS score and age: base, squared, and cubed). Model performance (ability to predict utility values) was assessed by ranking mean error, mean absolute error, and root mean square error. Algorithm performance in 3 external datasets was also evaluated.

resultsThere was moderate correlation between EPDS score and utility values (coefficient:  - 0.42). The best performing model type was a two-part model, followed by ordinary least squared. Inclusion of squared and cubed covariates improved model performance. Based on graphs of observed and predicted utility values, the algorithm performed better when utility was above 0.6.

conclusionsThis direct mapping algorithm allows the estimation of health utility values from EPDS scores. The algorithm has good external validity but is likely to perform better in samples with higher health status.

Indexed as

Health StatusQuality of LifeAlgorithmsCohort StudiesHumansPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSurveys and QuestionnairesEdinburgh Postnatal Depression ScaleEQ-5DMappingPerinatal depressionUtility

Identifiers

PMID37093502
PMCPMC10858827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.