Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37093455›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2023

Comparison of the predictive value of pathological response at primary tumor and lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer.

Pengfei Su, Yingjing Zhang, Tian Yu, Lin Jiang, Weiming Kang, Yuqin Liu, Jianchun Yu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pengfei SuDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yingjing ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Tian YuDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Lin JiangDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Weiming KangDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yuqin LiuDepartment of Pathology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100005, China.
Jianchun YuDepartment of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. yu-jch@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9994-177X
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

High-level Hospital Construction Project of Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital 2022-PUMCH-B-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative chemotherapy has been increasingly used in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). However, the prognostic factors are still insufficient. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of pathological response of the primary tumor to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and the lymph node status after NACT.

methodsData from 160 patients with LAGC treated with NACT followed by gastrectomy and met the inclusion criteria between March 2016 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Pathological evaluation after NACT was based on the grade of pathological response of the primary tumor and the status of lymph node. Survival curves for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival difference. Univariate and multivariate analyses for prognostic factors were based on the Cox regression.

resultsAmong 160 selected cases, 90 had pathological response (PR), while 70 had no pathological response (nPR) to NACT. Smaller tumor size was presented in PR group, which also had lower level of signet ring cell features, compared to nPR group (all p < 0.05). Based on the status of lymph nodes, nodal status (-) group showed smaller tumor size, lower depth of tumor invasion, better differentiated degree, lower level of signet ring cell features, lower rate of lymphatic and venous invasion and less advanced ypTNM stage (all p < 0.05). Survival was equivalent between PR and nPR group (all p > 0.05), while patients with no lymph node metastasis had better DFS than that with lymph node metastasis (HR 0.301, 95% CI 0.194-0.468, p = 0.002). Multivariable Cox regression analysis identified that lymph node status after NACT was an independent prognostic factor associated with survival (OS: hazard ratio 1.756, 95% CI 1.114-3.278, p = 0.029; DFS: hazard ratio 1.901, 95% CI 1.331-3.093, p = 0.012).

conclusionLymph node status is a potential independent prognostic factor for LAGC patients treated with NACT and may be more efficient than pathological response in primary tumor.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Signet Ring CellStomach NeoplasmsHumansLymph NodesNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesGastric cancerLymph nodeNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPathological responseSurvival

Identifiers

PMID37093455
OpenAlexW4366822559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.