Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37093307›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2023

A COVID-19 vaccine candidate based on SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and immune-stimulating complexes.

Javier Villarraza, Antonela Fuselli, Agustina Gugliotta, Ernesto Garay, María Celeste Rodríguez, Diego Fontana, Sebastián Antuña, Victoria Gastaldi, Juan Manuel Battagliotti, María Belén Tardivo and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Javier VillarrazaUNL, CONICET, FBCB, Centro Biotecnológico del Litoral, Santa Fe, Pcia., Santa Fe, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1256-1684
Antonela FuselliUNL, CONICET, FBCB, Centro Biotecnológico del Litoral, Santa Fe, Pcia., Santa Fe, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4497-366X
Agustina GugliottaUNL, CONICET, FBCB, Centro Biotecnológico del Litoral, Santa Fe, Pcia., Santa Fe, Argentina. agugliotta@fbcb.unl.edu.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8084-303X
Ernesto GarayUNL, CONICET, FBCB, Centro Biotecnológico del Litoral, Santa Fe, Pcia., Santa Fe, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3694-8982
María Celeste RodríguezUNL, CONICET, FBCB, Centro Biotecnológico del Litoral, Santa Fe, Pcia., Santa Fe, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7640-6221
Diego FontanaBiotecnofe S.A. PTLC, Santa Fe, Pcia., Santa Fe, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5109-7637
Sebastián AntuñaBiotecnofe S.A. PTLC, Santa Fe, Pcia., Santa Fe, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4049-2639
Victoria GastaldiUNL, CONICET, FBCB, Centro Biotecnológico del Litoral, Santa Fe, Pcia., Santa Fe, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1115-7527
Juan Manuel BattagliottiUNL, CONICET, FBCB, Centro Biotecnológico del Litoral, Santa Fe, Pcia., Santa Fe, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0375-9595
María Belén TardivoBiotecnofe S.A. PTLC, Santa Fe, Pcia., Santa Fe, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2199-4644
Diego AlvarezInstituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4449-9670
Eliana CastroInstituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1153-1176
Juliana CassataroInstituto de Investigaciones Biotecnológicas, Universidad Nacional de San Martín (UNSAM) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7122-869X
Natalia CeaglioUNL, CONICET, FBCB, Centro Biotecnológico del Litoral, Santa Fe, Pcia., Santa Fe, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2798-4532
Claudio PrietoBiotecnofe S.A. PTLC, Santa Fe, Pcia., Santa Fe, Argentina.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0422-0153
Instituto de Agrobiotecnología del Litoral · ARCentro Científico Tecnológico - Santa Fe · ARConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AR

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Promoción de la Investigación, el Desarrollo Tecnológico y la Innovación IP-COVID-19-224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spike protein from SARS-CoV-2, the etiologic agent of the COVID-19 pandemic disease, constitutes a structural protein that proved to be the main responsible for neutralizing antibody production. Thus, its sequence is highly considered for the design of candidate vaccines. Animal cell culture represents the best option for the production of subunit vaccines based on recombinant proteins since they introduce post-translational modifications that are important to mimic the natural antigenic epitopes. Particularly, the human cell line HEK293T has been explored and used for the production of biotherapeutics since the products derived from them present human-like post-translational modifications that are important for the protein's activity and immunogenicity. The aim of this study was to produce and characterize a potential vaccine for COVID-19 based on the spike ectodomain (S-ED) of SARS-CoV-2 and two different adjuvants: aluminum hydroxide (AH) and immune-stimulating complexes (ISCOMs). The S-ED was produced in sHEK293T cells using a 1-L stirred tank bioreactor operated in perfusion mode and purified. S-ED characterization revealed the expected size and morphology. High N-glycan content was confirmed. S-ED-specific binding with the hACE2 (human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) receptor was verified. The immunogenicity of S-ED was evaluated using AH and ISCOMs. Both formulations demonstrated the presence of anti-RBD antibodies in the plasma of immunized mice, being significantly higher for the latter adjuvant. Also, higher levels of IFN-γ and IL-4 were detected after the ex vivo immune stimulation of spleen-derived MNCs from ISCOMs immunized mice. Further analysis confirmed that S-ED/ISCOMs elicit neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. KEY POINTS: Trimeric SARS-CoV-2 S-ED was produced in stable recombinant sHEK cells in serum-free medium. A novel S-ED vaccine formulation induced potent humoral and cellular immunity. S-ED formulated with ISCOMs adjuvant elicited a highly neutralizing antibody titer.

Indexed as

COVID-19ISCOMsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAluminum HydroxideAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntigen-Antibody ComplexCOVID-19 VaccinesHEK293 CellsHumansMicePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAdjuvants, ImmunologicAluminum HydroxideAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntigen-Antibody ComplexCOVID-19 VaccinesISCOMsSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2Continuous processHEK293 cellsImmune responseImmune-stimulating complexes adjuvantNeutralizing antibodiesSARS-CoV-2 spike

Identifiers

PMID37093307
PMCPMC10124706
OpenAlexW4366817131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.