Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37093301›Full record

ReviewBrain informatics2023

Deep learning and machine learning in psychiatry: a survey of current progress in depression detection, diagnosis and treatment.

Matthew Squires, Xiaohui Tao, Soman Elangovan, Raj Gururajan, Xujuan Zhou, U Rajendra Acharya, Yuefeng Li

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
31.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. DHCA-Net: A Novel Dual-Stream Hierarchical Channel Attention Network for Explainable Autism Spectrum Disorder Detection From Facial Images.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Using large language models to detect outcomes in qualitative studies of adolescent depression.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew SquiresSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Computing, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia. Matthew.Squires@usq.edu.au.
Xiaohui TaoSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Computing, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.
Soman ElangovanBelmont Private Hospital, QLD, Brisbane, Australia.
Raj GururajanSchool of Business, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia.
Xujuan ZhouSchool of Business, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, QLD, Australia.
U Rajendra AcharyaSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Computing, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia.
Yuefeng LiSchool of Computer Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
University of Southern Queensland · AUBelmont Hospital · AUQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Informatics paradigms for brain and mental health research have seen significant advances in recent years. These developments can largely be attributed to the emergence of new technologies such as machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence. Data-driven methods have the potential to support mental health care by providing more precise and personalised approaches to detection, diagnosis, and treatment of depression. In particular, precision psychiatry is an emerging field that utilises advanced computational techniques to achieve a more individualised approach to mental health care. This survey provides an overview of the ways in which artificial intelligence is currently being used to support precision psychiatry. Advanced algorithms are being used to support all phases of the treatment cycle. These systems have the potential to identify individuals suffering from mental health conditions, allowing them to receive the care they need and tailor treatments to individual patients who are mostly to benefit. Additionally, unsupervised learning techniques are breaking down existing discrete diagnostic categories and highlighting the vast disease heterogeneity observed within depression diagnoses. Artificial intelligence also provides the opportunity to shift towards evidence-based treatment prescription, moving away from existing methods based on group averages. However, our analysis suggests there are several limitations currently inhibiting the progress of data-driven paradigms in care. Significantly, none of the surveyed articles demonstrate empirically improved patient outcomes over existing methods. Furthermore, greater consideration needs to be given to uncertainty quantification, model validation, constructing interdisciplinary teams of researchers, improved access to diverse data and standardised definitions within the field. Empirical validation of computer algorithms via randomised control trials which demonstrate measurable improvement to patient outcomes are the next step in progressing models to clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningDepressionNeural networksPsychiatryTreatment response prediction

Identifiers

PMID37093301
PMCPMC10123592
OpenAlexW4366821924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.