Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37093280›Full record

Observational studySurgical endoscopy2023

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in super elderly (> 90 years of age): safety and outcomes.

Camilo Ramírez-Giraldo, Camila Rosas-Morales, Fiamma Vásquez, Andrés Isaza-Restrepo, Milcíades Ibáñez-Pinilla, Saul Vargas-Rubiano, Felipe Vargas-Barato

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camilo Ramírez-GiraldoHospital Universitario Mayor - Méderi, Bogotá, Colombia. ramirezgiraldocamilo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1929-2299
Camila Rosas-MoralesUniversidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
Fiamma VásquezUniversidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
Andrés Isaza-RestrepoHospital Universitario Mayor - Méderi, Bogotá, Colombia.
Milcíades Ibáñez-PinillaUniversidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.
Saul Vargas-RubianoHospital Universitario Mayor - Méderi, Bogotá, Colombia.
Felipe Vargas-BaratoHospital Universitario Mayor - Méderi, Bogotá, Colombia.
Universidad del Rosario · COHospital Universitario Nacional de Colombia · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonagenarian patients are an age group in progressive growth. In this age group, indications for surgical procedures, including cholecystectomy, will be increasingly frequent, as biliary pathology and its complications are frequent in this population group. The main objective of this study was to analyze the safety and outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients older than 90 years.

methodsA retrospective observational cohort study was designed. This study involved 600 patients that were classified in 4 age groups for analysis (under 50 years, 50-69 years, 70-89 years, and over 90 years). Demographic, clinical, paraclinics, surgical, and outcome variables were compared according to age group. A multivariate analysis, which included variables considered clinically relevant, was performed to identify factors associated with mortality and complications classified with the Clavien-Dindo scale.

resultsThe patients evaluated had a median age of 65.0 (IQR 34.0) years and there was a female predominance (61.8%). A higher complication rate, conversion rate, subtotal cholecystectomy rate, and prolonged hospital stay were found in nonagenarians. The overall mortality rate was 1.6%. Mortality in the age group over 90 years was 6.8%. Regression models showed that age over 90 years (RR 4.6 CI95% 1.07-20.13), presence of cholecystitis (RR 8.2 CI95% 1.29-51.81), and time from admission to cholecystectomy (RR 1.2 CI95% 1.10-1.40) were the variables that presented statistically significant differences as risk factors for mortality.

conclusionCholecystectomy in nonagenarian patients has a higher rate of complications, conversion rate, subtotal cholecystectomy rate, and mortality. Therefore, an adequate perioperative assessment is necessary to optimize comorbidities and improve outcomes. Also, it is important to know the greatest risk for informed consent and choose the surgical equipment and schedule of the procedure.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholecystitisCholecystitis, AcuteAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCholecystectomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeCholecystitisElderlyLaparoscopic cholecystectomyMorbidity and mortalitySuper elderly

Identifiers

PMID37093280
PMCPMC10338395
OpenAlexW4366822572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.