Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37093266›Full record

Trial reportCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2023

Rituximab biosimilar for the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a phase 3 randomized study in India.

Ankit Patel, Niraj Bhatt, S S Prakash, Ghanashyam Biswas, Rajnish Nagarkar, Bodhisatta Roy, Priyanka Samal, Narendra Agrawal, Sushil Meshram, Ashish Kaushal and 20 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Biosimilar monoclonal antibodies for cancer treatment in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 18 institutions in 1 country.

Ankit PatelUnique Hospital Multispecialty & Research Institute, Surat, India.
Niraj BhattKailash Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Vadodara, India.
S S PrakashMMC and RI, K R Hospital, Mysore, India.
Ghanashyam BiswasSparsh Hospital & Critical Care (P) Ltd, Bhubaneswar, India.
Rajnish NagarkarHCG Manavata Cancer Centre, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
Bodhisatta RoyNetaji Subhash Chandra Bose Cancer Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Priyanka SamalInstitute of Medical Sciences (IMS) and SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Narendra AgrawalRajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India.
Sushil MeshramGovernment Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Ashish KaushalHCG Cancer Centre, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
C T SatheeshHealthcare Global Enterprises Limited, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Ravikumar Wategaonkar7-Orange Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Kasi Viswanathan ThiagarajanMeenakshi Mission Hospital and Research Centre, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kartikeya JainShree Himalaya Cancer Hospital & Research Institute, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
P VijayaveeranUniversal Cancer Hospital, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kalyan MukherjeeChittaranjan National Cancer Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Kishore SinghMaulana Azad Medical College and Lok Nayak Hospital, Delhi, India.
Tushar PatilGlobal Hospital & Research Institute, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Amit JainValentis Cancer Hospital, Uttar Pradesh, Mussoorie, Meerut, India.
Tuphan Kanti DolaiNil Ratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Minish JainGrant Medical Foundation, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Sachin HingmireDeenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Tara Chand GuptaApex Hospital Private Limited, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
K C LakshmaiahSrinivasam Cancer Care Multispeciality Hospitals India Pvt. Ltd, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Deepan RajamanickamThangam Hospital and Thangam Cancer Center, Namakkal, Tamil Nadu, India.
Bhushan NemadeNavsanjeevani Hospital, Nashik, Maharashtra, India.
Vikash GoyalSanjeevani CBCC Cancer Hospital, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Pinaki MahatoHCG Cancer Centre, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.
Sanjeev Kumar MendirattaBiologics (R & D and Manufacturing), Zydus Research Center, Moraiya, Ahmedabad, 382213, India. sanjeevkumar@zyduslife.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7440-5647
Maulik DoshiBiologics (R & D and Manufacturing), Zydus Research Center, Moraiya, Ahmedabad, 382213, India.
HCG Cancer Centre · INCadila Healthcare (India) · INCancer Hospital and Research Institute · INApex Heart Institute · INChittaranjan National Cancer Institute · INDeenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Center · INGlobal Hospitals · INGovernment Medical College · INGrant Medical College and Sir Jamshedjee Jeejeebhoy Group of Hospitals · INHealthcare Global Enterprises · INInstitute of Medical Sciences and Sum Hospital · INMaulana Azad Medical College · INMeenakshi Mission Hospital and Research Centre · INNetaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute · INNil Ratan Sircar Medical College and Hospital · INRajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre · INSanjivani Super Speciality Hospitals · INSparsh Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVery few studies have demonstrated the rituximab biosimilarity in terms of efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in India. Therefore, we compared the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and immunogenicity of our biosimilar rituximab with the reference rituximab (Ristova, Roche products [India] Pvt. Ltd) in patients with DLBCL in India.

methodsA phase 3, randomized, assessor-blind, parallel-group, two-arm study was conducted across 28 sites in India. A total of 153 newly diagnosed DLBCL patients were randomized to receive either biosimilar rituximab or reference rituximab. The study drugs were administered at a dose of 375 mg/m

resultsThe ORR at the end of Cycle 6 was 82.14% in the biosimilar rituximab and 85.71% in the reference rituximab group. The risk difference (90% CIs) was - 3.57 (- 14.80, 7.66). It met the non-inferiority margin of - 20%. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were comparable between the two treatment groups. The incidence rate of immunogenicity was very low and similar in both the treatment groups. The safety profile of both the treatments was comparable with no major difference in terms of nature, frequency and severity of TEAEs.

conclusionThe study demonstrated the biosimilarity between the biosimilar rituximab and the reference rituximab. Our biosimilar rituximab could add to the cost-effective treatment alternatives for patients with DLBCL in India.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseHumansIndiaInfusions, IntravenousRituximabTreatment OutcomeBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsRituximabBiosimilarCHOPDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaORRRituximab

Identifiers

PMID37093266
PMCPMC10124690
OpenAlexW4366817126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.