ArticleExperimental brain research2023
The elicitation of affordance depends on conceptual attributes: evidence from a virtual reality study.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- On the functional brain networks involved in tool-related action understanding.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Eating Russula mushrooms is a matter of semantic knowledge. Comment on "The elicitation of affordance depends on conceptual attributes: evidence from a virtual reality study" by Lai et al. (2023).Experimental brain research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Affordance is a property of object with respect to the observer, which is related to the attributes of the object. In the present study, we examined whether affordance elicitation is primarily based on the conceptual attributes or instance attributes of the object. To distinguish the role of the two types of attributes in elicitation of affordance, we manipulated the size of a pan in virtual reality (Experiment 1). The critical condition is the giant pan, which should elicit manipulability affordance if affordance is concept-based and it should not elicit manipulability affordance if affordance is instance-based. The results support the former assumption, i.e., the elicitation of affordance is concept-based. To confirm the conclusion, we created a water-handled pan in virtual reality and examined its manipulability affordance (Experiment 2). The water-handled pan looks similar to a normal pan, but its handle is composed of flowing water which, in concept, cannot be grasped. Consistent with the concept-based conclusion, the water-handled pan did not elicit manipulability affordance. The present findings provided convergent evidence that ordinary people rely primarily on conceptual attributes of the object to elicit manipulability affordance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37093257What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.