ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2023
Insights Into PROM1-Macular Disease Using Multimodal Imaging.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Initial Site of Macular Involvement in Central Retinal Dystrophies Revealed by Fundus Autofluorescence and Optical Coherence Tomography.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Prominin-1 Regulates Retinal Pigment Epithelium Homeostasis: Transcriptomic Insights into Degenerative Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Near-Infrared Autofluorescence: Early Detection of Retinal Pigment Epithelial Alterations in Inherited Retinal Dystrophies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Article
- Updates on Emerging Interventions for Autosomal RecessiveJournal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the features of genetically confirmed PROM1-macular dystrophy in multimodal images. Methods: Thirty-six (36) eyes of 18 patients (5-66 years; mean age, 42.4 years) were prospectively studied by clinical examination and multimodal imaging. Short-wavelength autofluorescence (SW-AF) and quantitative fundus autofluorescence (qAF) images were acquired with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope (HRA+OCT, Heidelberg Engineering) modified by insertion of an internal autofluorescent reference. Further clinical testing included near-infrared autofluorescence (NIR-AF; HRA2, Heidelberg Engineering) with semiquantitative analysis, spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (HRA+OCT) and full-field electroretinography. All patients were genetically confirmed by exome sequencing. Results: All 18 patients presented with varying degrees of maculopathy. One family with individuals affected across two generations exhibited granular fleck-like deposits across the posterior pole. Areas of granular deposition in SW-AF and NIR-AF corresponded to intermittent loss of the ellipsoid zone, whereas discrete regions of hypoautofluorescence corresponded with a loss of outer retinal layers in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography scans. For 18 of the 20 eyes, qAF levels within the macula were within the 95% confidence intervals of healthy age-matched individuals; nor was the mean NIR-AF signal increased relative to healthy eyes. Conclusions: Although PROM1-macular dystrophy (Stargardt disease 4) can exhibit phenotypic overlap with recessive Stargardt disease, significantly increased SW-AF levels were not detected. As such, elevated bisretinoid lipofuscin may not be a feature of the pathophysiology of PROM1 disease. The qAF approach could serve as a method of early differential diagnosis and may help to identify appropriate disease targets as therapeutics become available to treat inherited retinal disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.