Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37093009›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2023

Exosome-Based Multivalent Vaccine: Achieving Potent Immunization, Broadened Reactivity, and Strong T-Cell Responses with Nanograms of Proteins.

Mafalda Cacciottolo, Justin B Nice, Yujia Li, Michael J LeClaire, Ryan Twaddle, Ciana L Mora, Stephanie Y Adachi, Esther R Chin, Meredith Young, Jenna Angeles and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Harnessing Nanocarriers to Advance Vaccine Development.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. mRNA-based therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mafalda Cacciottolo *Capricor Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3093-0535
Justin B Nice *Capricor Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Yujia LiCapricor Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Michael J LeClaireCapricor Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Ryan TwaddleCapricor Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Ciana L MoraCapricor Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Stephanie Y AdachiCapricor Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Esther R ChinCapricor Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Meredith YoungCapricor Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Jenna AngelesCapricor Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Kristi ElliottCapricor Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.
Minghao SunCapricor Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-1756-6506
Capricor Therapeutics (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently approved vaccines against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) have focused solely on the spike protein to provide immunity. The first vaccines were developed rapidly using spike mRNA delivered by lipid nanoparticles but required ultralow-temperature storage and have had limited immunity against variations in spike. Subsequently, protein-based vaccines were developed, which offer broader immunity but require significant time for development and the use of an adjuvant to boost the immune response. Here, exosomes were used to deliver a bivalent protein-based vaccine in which two independent viral proteins were used. Exosomes were engineered to express either SARS-CoV-2 delta spike (Stealth X-Spike [STX-S]) or the more conserved nucleocapsid (Stealth X-Nucleocapsid [STX-N]) protein on the surface. When administered as a single product (STX-S or STX-N) or in combination (STX-S+N), both STX-S and STX-N induced strong immunization with the production of potent humoral and cellular immune responses. Interestingly, these results were obtained with the administration of only nanograms of protein and without an adjuvant. In two independent animal models (mouse and rabbit), the administration of nanograms of the STX-S+N vaccine resulted in increased antibody production, potent neutralizing antibodies with cross-reactivity to other variants of spike, and strong T-cell responses. Importantly, no competition of immune responses was observed, allowing the delivery of nucleocapsid with spike to offer improved SARS-CoV-2 immunity. These data show that the StealthX exosome platform has the enormous potential to revolutionize vaccinology by combining the advantages of mRNA and recombinant protein vaccines into a superior, rapidly generated, low-dose vaccine resulting in potent, broader immunity.

Indexed as

COVID-19ExosomesViral VaccinesAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralImmunizationMiceRabbitsRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-2T-LymphocytesVaccines, CombinedAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralRNA, MessengerVaccines, CombinedViral VaccinesCOVIDexosomelentiviral systemneutralizing antibodiesnucleocapsidomicronsevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2spiketherapeuticvaccine

Identifiers

PMID37093009
PMCPMC10269692
OpenAlexW4366822130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.