ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2023
Estimating cochlear impulse responses using frequency sweeps.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impulse response of the organ of Corti at the apex of the intact cochlea.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimal Scale-Invariant Wavelet Representation and Filtering of Human Otoacoustic Emissions.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024Review
- Swept Along: Measuring Otoacoustic Emissions Using Continuously Varying Stimuli.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024Review
- Intracochlear overdrive: Characterizing nonlinear wave amplification in the mouse apex.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cochlear mechanics tends to be studied using single-location measurements of intracochlear vibrations in response to acoustical stimuli. Such measurements, due to their invasiveness and often the instability of the animal preparation, are difficult to accomplish and, thus, ideally require stimulus paradigms that are time efficient, flexible, and result in high resolution transfer functions. Here, a swept-sine method is adapted for recordings of basilar membrane impulse responses in mice. The frequency of the stimulus was exponentially swept from low to high (upward) or high to low (downward) at varying rates (from slow to fast) and intensities. The cochlear response to the swept-sine was then convolved with the time-reversed stimulus waveform to obtain first and higher order impulse responses. Slow sweeps of either direction produce cochlear first to third order transfer functions equivalent to those measured with pure tones. Fast upward sweeps, on the other hand, generate impulse responses that typically ring longer, as observed in responses obtained using clicks. The ringing of impulse response in mice was of relatively small amplitude and did not affect the magnitude spectra. It is concluded that swept-sine methods offer flexible and time-efficient alternatives to other approaches for recording cochlear impulse responses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.