ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine
Clinical utility of fungal culture and antifungal susceptibility in cats and dogs with histoplasmosis.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feline enteropathogens and molecular diagnostics: benefits, limitations and clinical applications.Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2025Review
- Role of Posaconazole Drug in the Treatment of Invasive Fungal Disease: A Review.Infectious disorders drug targets · 2025Review
- Clinical utility of fungal culture and antifungal susceptibility in cats and dogs with histoplasmosis.Journal of veterinary internal medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCulture can be used for diagnosis and antifungal susceptibility testing in animals with fungal infections. Limited information is available regarding the diagnostic performance of culture and the susceptibility patterns of Histoplasma spp. isolates. HYPOTHESIS/
objectivesDescribe the clinical utility of culture and the susceptibility patterns of Histoplasma spp. isolates causing histoplasmosis in cats and dogs. ANIMALS: Seventy-one client-owned animals, including 33 cats and 19 dogs with proven or probable histoplasmosis.
methodsCulture was attempted from tissue or fluid samples. Diagnostic performance of culture, cytopathology, and antigen detection were compared with final diagnosis. Susceptibility to antifungal agents was determined for a subset (11 from dogs, 9 from cats) of culture isolates.
resultsCulture had a diagnostic sensitivity of 17/33 (52%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 34%-69%) and 15/19 (79%; 95% CI, 61%-97%) and specificity of 6/6 (100%; 95% CI, 54%-100%) and 10/10 (100%; 95% CI, 69%-100%) in cats and dogs, respectively. Culture was not positive in any animal in which cytopathology and antigen testing were negative. Target drug exposure (area under the concentration curve [AUC]/minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] >25) should be easily achieved for all isolates for itraconazole, voriconazole, or posaconazole. Five of 20 (25%) isolates had fluconazole MIC ≥32 μg/mL and achieving target drug exposure is unlikely. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Fungal culture did not improve diagnostic sensitivity when used with cytopathology and antigen detection. Susceptibility testing might help identify isolates for which fluconazole is less likely to be effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.