Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37092434›Full record

ReviewPalliative medicine2023

The emotional effects on professional interpreters of interpreting palliative care conversations for adult patients: A rapid review.

Jennifer A Hancox, Clare F McKiernan, Alice L Martin, Jon Tomas, John I MacArtney

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Palliative medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer A HancoxDepartment of Supportive and Palliative Care, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7826-460X
Clare F McKiernanDepartment of Supportive and Palliative Care, Birmingham St Mary's Hospice, Birmingham, UK.
Alice L MartinDepartment of Supportive and Palliative Care, Birmingham St Mary's Hospice, Birmingham, UK.
Jon TomasDepartment of Supportive and Palliative Care, University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK.
John I MacArtneyUnit of Academic Primary Care, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0879-4277
St Christopher's Hospice · GBNIHR Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre · GBUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProfessional interpreters working in palliative contexts improve patient care. Whilst literature identifies psychological distress in other healthcare professionals, research into emotional effects on professional interpreters in this highly emotive setting is limited. Isolating emotional responses may enable targeted interventions to enhance interpreter use and improve wellbeing. Timely evidence is needed to urgently familiarise the profession with issues faced by these valuable colleagues, to affect practice.

aimDescribe the emotional effects on professional interpreters of interpreting adult palliative care conversations. Collate recommendations to mitigate negative emotional effects.

designWe performed a rapid review of studies identifying emotional effects on professional interpreters of interpreting adult palliative conversations. Rapid review chosen to present timely evidence to relevant stakeholders in a resource-efficient way. Thematic analysis managed using NVivo. Quality appraisal evaluated predominantly using CASP checklists. Reported using PRISMA guidelines. PROSPERO registration CRD42022301753. DATA SOURCES: Articles available in English on PubMed [1966-2021], MEDLINE [1946-2021], EMBASE [1974-2021], CINAHL [1981-2021] and PsycINFO [1806-2021] in December 2021.

resultsEleven articles from the USA (5), Australia (3), Canada (2) and UK (1). Eight interview-based, two online surveys and one quality improvement project. Themes included (1) Identifying diversity of emotional effects: emotions including stress, discomfort, loneliness. (2) Identifying factors affecting interpreters' emotional responses: impact of morals, culture and role expectations; working with patients and families; interpreter experience and age. (3) Recommendations to mitigate negative emotional effects: pre-briefing, debriefing and interpreter/provider training.

conclusionProfessional interpreters experience myriad emotional responses to palliative conversations. Role clarity, collaborative working and formal training may alleviate negative effects.

Indexed as

Palliative CareTranslatingAdultCommunicationCommunication BarriersEmotionsHumansHealth personnelpalliative careprofessional interpreterpsychological distresssystematic reviewterminal care

Identifiers

PMID37092434
PMCPMC10320707
OpenAlexW4366820242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.