Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37092093›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2022

Bloodstream infection in cancer patients; susceptibility profiles of the isolated pathogens, at Khartoum Oncology Hospital, Sudan.

Omeima Mohammed Zain, Mohimmen Yousif Elsayed, Sozan M Abdelkhalig, Manal Abdelaziz, Safaa Yahia Ibrahim, Tahane Bashir, Yassir Hamadalnil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Extended spectrum beta lactamases and carbapenemase-producingOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Omeima Mohammed ZainDepartment of Microbiology, Khartoum oncology hospital, Khartoum, Sudan.
Mohimmen Yousif ElsayedDepartment of Microbiology, Khartoum oncology hospital, Khartoum, Sudan.
Sozan M AbdelkhaligDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, AlMaarefa Uinversity, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Manal AbdelazizDepartment of Microbiology, Alzaeem Alazhari university, Khartoum, Sudan.
Safaa Yahia IbrahimDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Omdurman Islamic University, Khartoum, Sudan.
Tahane BashirFaculty of Medicine, Red Sea University, Port Sudan, Sudan.
Yassir HamadalnilDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Nile University, Khartoum, Sudan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Bloodstream infection is one of the major causes of mortality in patients with malignancies. This study aimed to determine the local profile of blood culture isolates and their antibiotic sensitivities in febrile neutropenic cancer patients and to decide if any modifications to antibiotics policies are necessary. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study conducted between the first of October to the end of December 2018 at Khartoum Oncology Hospital, Sudan. Blood samples from febrile neutropenic patients were collected for culture. Isolates were identified, and their antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by standard laboratory procedures. Results: Bloodstream infections were confirmed in 12 % (n = 69/569) of total blood cultures. Gram negative bacilli were the dominant causative agents (63.8%) while (36.2%) of infections were caused by gram positive cocci. Escherichia coli was the most common isolate (30.4%).The proportions of resistance among gram negative bacilli were high for cefuroxime, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, Ceftazidime, and ceftriaxone. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing isolates were identified in 34.1% of the positive cultures. Gram positive cocci showed high resistance to tetracycline, penicillin and erythromycin but were completely sensitive to vancomycin and gentamicin. Most of Staphylococcus aureus isolates were methicillin resistant. Conclusion: Gram negative bacilli were the predominant etiologic agents of bloodstream infections in our patients. Both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria showed high levels of resistance for most of the common antibiotics used for empiric treatment. Regular surveillance to study bacterial resistance patterns must be conducted to modify antibiotics stewardship in our institution.

Indexed as

BacteremiaFebrile NeutropeniaNeoplasmsSepsisStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHospitalsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSudanAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibiotics sensitivityBlood stream infectionmalignancySudan

Identifiers

PMID37092093
PMCPMC10117457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.