Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37091914›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2023

Evaluation of the guideline-adherence of coronary angiography in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome - Results from the German prospective multicentre ENLIGHT-KHK project.

Bastian Wein, Yana Seleznova, Dirk Mueller, Marie Naumann, Simon Loeser, Joerg Artmann, Thomas Fritz, Melanie Steffen, Ute Windhoevel, Michael Haude and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Recent highlights on coronary artery disease from theInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Bastian WeinElisabeth-Hospital, Contilia Heart and Vascular Centre, Essen, Germany.
Yana SeleznovaInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Germany.
Dirk MuellerInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Germany.
Marie NaumannInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Germany.
Simon LoeserAOK Rheinland-Hamburg, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Joerg ArtmannInstitute for Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, University of Cologne, Germany.
Thomas FritzAOK NORDWEST, Dortmund, Germany.
Melanie SteffenElisabeth-Hospital, Contilia Heart and Vascular Centre, Essen, Germany.
Ute WindhoevelCERC Deutschland GmbH, Essen, Germany.
Michael HaudeRheinlandklinikum Neuss, Germany.
Juergen Vom DahlMariahilf Hospital, Moenchengladbach, Germany.
Ulrich SchaeferHeart and Vascular Centre, Bad Bevensen, Germany.
Moritz MontenbruckMarien-Hospital, Hamburg, Germany.
Markus ZarseMedical Department III, Maerkische Kliniken, Luedenscheid, Germany.
Ruediger JegodkaElisabeth Hospital, Recklinghausen, Germany.
Thorsten DillSana Hospital Benrath, Medical Department, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Jan-Erik GuelkerPetrus Hospital, Department of Cardiology and Rhythmology, Wuppertal, Germany.
Dirk BoeseHochsauerland Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Arnsberg, Germany.
Oliver BruderElisabeth-Hospital, Contilia Heart and Vascular Centre, Essen, Germany.
University of Cologne · DEKliniken Maria Hilf · DEKlinik Lüneburger Heide · DEKlinikum Arnsberg · DEKlinikum Lüdenscheid · DEKlinikum Rheine · DEKrankenhaus Nordwest · DERuhr University Bochum · DESana Klinikum · DESt. Marien Hospital · DEUniversity of Augsburg · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With 900'000 coronary angiographies (CA) per year, Germany has the highest annual per capita volume in Europe. Until now there are no prospective clinical data on the degree of guideline-adherence in the use of CA in patients with suspected chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) in Germany. Methods: Between January 2019 and August 2021, 458 patients with suspected CCS were recruited in nine German centres. Guideline-adherence was evaluated according to the current European Society of Cardiology and German guidelines. Pre-test probability (PTP) for CAD was determined using age, gender, and a standardized patient questionnaire to identify symptoms. Data on the diagnostic work-up were obtained from health records. Results: Patients were in mean 66.6 years old, male in 57.3 %, had known CAD in 48.4 % and presented with typical, atypical, non-anginal chest pain or dyspnoea in 35.7 %, 41.3 %, 23.0 % and 25.4 %, respectively. PTP according to the European guidelines was in mean 24.2 % (11.9 %-36.5 % 95 % CI). 20.9 % of the patients received guideline-recommended preceding non-invasive image guided testing. The use of CA was adherent to the European and German guideline recommendations in 20.4 % and 25.4 %, respectively. In multivariate-analysis, arterial hypertension and prior revascularization were predictors of guideline non-adherence. Conclusion: These are the first prospective clinical data which demonstrated an overall low degree of guideline-adherence in the use of CA in patients with suspected CCS in the German health care setting. To improve adherence rates, the availability of and access to non-invasive image guided testing needs to be strengthened. (German Clinical Trials Registry DRKS00015638 - Registration Date: 19.02.2019).

Indexed as

Angina pectorisChronic coronary syndromeCoronary angiographyCoronary artery diseaseGuideline adherence

Identifiers

PMID37091914
PMCPMC10120367
OpenAlexW4362720230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.