ReviewInnovation (Cambridge (Mass.))2023
Evolution of the Yangtze River and its biodiversity.
Review in Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chromosome-Level Genome Assembly and Annotation of the Chinese Lizard Gudgeon (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Geological processes shaping freshwater biodiversity: a synthesis of global evidence.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026Review
- Evolutionary history of Chinese cavefishes parallels paleogeoclimatic and river capture processes.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Phylogenetic evidence reveals the classification and evolutionary history of endemic cavefish in China.BMC ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- The telomere-to-telomere genome assembly of the Triplophysa erythraea (Nemacheilidae hypogean fishes).Scientific data · 2025Article
- Rapid speciation of Chinese hypogean fishes driven by paleogeoclimatic and morphological adaptations.Current zoology · 2025Article
- Metabolic Adaptation to Following Temperature Acclimation in Fish on the Yun-Gui Plateau.Biology · 2025Article
- Ultrastructure and Transcriptomic Analysis Reveal Alternative Pathways of Zona Radiata Formation inBiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Artificial intelligence for geoscience: Progress, challenges, and perspectives.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2024Review
- Genetic Signature of River Capture Imprinted inGenes · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Documenting the origins of megadiverse (sub)tropical aquatic ecosystems is an important goal for studies of evolution and ecology. Nonetheless, the geological and ecological establishment of the modern Yangtze River remains poorly understood. Here, we reconstruct the geographic and ecological history of an endemic clade of East Asian fishes based on the mitochondrial phylogenomics analysis of Cyprinidae using 15 fossil calibrations. We estimate an ancestral condition of benthic spawning with demersal or adhesive eggs in southern East Asia before ∼23 Ma and a derived condition of riverine spawning with semibuoyant eggs in the Yangtze by ∼18 Ma. These results imply the formation of Yangtze riverine ecosystems around the Oligocene-Miocene boundary in response to plateau uplift and monsoon strengthening. Some of these cyprinids reverted to benthic spawning with adhesive eggs by ∼15 Ma, a time of rising to peak net diversification rates, indicating the formation of potamo-lacustrine ecosystems by the mid-Miocene during a strong East Asian summer monsoon. Our study provides increased spatiotemporal resolution for the co-evolutionary histories of the Yangtze River and its biodiversity and highlights biological evidence concerning the geomorphological dynamics of the Yangtze River.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.