ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2023
Stable tissue-mimicking phantoms for longitudinal multimodality imaging studies that incorporate optical, CT, and MRI contrast.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Roadmap for light interaction with biophotonic surfaces and their diverse applications.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Optical phantoms for the characterization and validation of imaging and spectroscopy: a review.Biophotonics discovery · 2026Review
- MRI-Guided Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Tomography (MRg-NIRST) Imaging System With Wearable Breast Optical Interface for Breast Cancer Imaging.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025Article
- Noise & mottle suppression methods for cumulative Cherenkov images of radiation therapy delivery.Physics in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- The application prospects of robot pose estimation technology: exploring new directions based on YOLOv8-ApexNet.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2024Article
- Gel-based Ocular Phantom Models in Glaucoma Diagnostics: A Bibliometric and Narrative Review.Journal of current glaucoma practiceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Significance: Tissue phantoms that mimic the optical and radiologic properties of human or animal tissue play an important role in the development, characterization, and evaluation of imaging systems. Phantoms that are easily produced and stable for longitudinal studies are highly desirable. Aim: A new type of long-lasting phantom was developed with commercially available materials and was assessed for fabrication ease, stability, and optical property control. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and x-ray computed tomography (CT) contrast properties were also evaluated. Approach: A systematic investigation of relationships between concentrations of skin-like pigments and composite optical properties was conducted to realize optical property phantoms in the red and near-infrared (NIR) wavelength range that also offered contrast for CT and MRI. Results: Phantom fabrication time was Conclusions: The phantoms described here mimic optical properties of soft tissue and are suitable for multimodality imaging studies involving CT or MRI without adding secondary contrast agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.