Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37091823›Full record

ReviewAIMS microbiology2023

An update on lateral flow immunoassay for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies.

Lucia Spicuzza, Davide Campagna, Chiara Di Maria, Enrico Sciacca, Salvatore Mancuso, Carlo Vancheri, Gianluca Sambataro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AIMS microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Optical lateral flow assays in early diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lucia SpicuzzaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Davide CampagnaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Chiara Di MariaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Enrico SciaccaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Salvatore MancusoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Carlo VancheriDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Gianluca SambataroDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last three years, after the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, an unprecedented number of novel diagnostic tests have been developed. Assays to evaluate the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 have been widely considered as part of the control strategy. The lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), to detect both IgM and IgG against SARS-CoV-2, has been widely studied as a point-of-care (POC) test. Compared to laboratory tests, LFIAs are faster, cheaper and user-friendly, thus available also in areas with low economic resources. Soon after the onset of the pandemic, numerous kits for rapid antibody detection were put on the market with an emergency use authorization. However, since then, scientists have tried to better define the accuracy of these tests and their usefulness in different contexts. In fact, while during the first phase of the pandemic LFIAs for antibody detection were auxiliary to molecular tests for the diagnosis of COVID-19, successively these tests became a tool of seroprevalence surveillance to address infection control policies. When in 2021 a massive vaccination campaign was implemented worldwide, the interest in LFIA reemerged due to the need to establish the extent and the longevity of immunization in the vaccinated population and to establish priorities to guide health policies in low-income countries with limited access to vaccines. Here, we summarize the accuracy, the advantages and limits of LFIAs as POC tests for antibody detection, highlighting the efforts that have been made to improve this technology over the last few years.

Indexed as

COVID-19IgGIgMlateral flow immunoassayneutralizing antibodiespoint of care testrapid antibody testSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID37091823
PMCPMC10113162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.