Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37091571›Full record

ReviewEcology and evolution2023

Bringing light onto the Raunkiæran shortfall: A comprehensive review of traits used in functional animal ecology.

Thiago Gonçalves-Souza, Leonardo S Chaves, Gabriel X Boldorini, Natália Ferreira, Reginaldo A F Gusmão, Phamela Bernardes Perônico, Nathan J Sanders, Fabrício B Teresa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thiago Gonçalves-SouzaDepartment of Biology, Ecological Synthesis and Biodiversity Conservation Lab Federal Rural University of Pernambuco Recife Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8471-7479
Leonardo S ChavesGraduate Program in Ethnobiology and Nature Conservation, Department of Biology Federal Rural University of Pernambuco Recife Brazil.
Gabriel X BoldoriniDepartment of Biology, Ecological Synthesis and Biodiversity Conservation Lab Federal Rural University of Pernambuco Recife Brazil.
Natália FerreiraGraduate Program in Biodiversity, Department of Biology Federal Rural University of Pernambuco Recife Brazil.
Reginaldo A F GusmãoDepartment of Biology, Ecological Synthesis and Biodiversity Conservation Lab Federal Rural University of Pernambuco Recife Brazil.
Phamela Bernardes PerônicoGraduate Program in Natural Resources of Cerrado State University of Goiás Anápolis Brazil.
Nathan J SandersDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6220-6731
Fabrício B TeresaGraduate Program in Natural Resources of Cerrado State University of Goiás Anápolis Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trait-based approaches elucidate the mechanisms underlying biodiversity response to, or effects on, the environment. Nevertheless, the Raunkiæran shortfall-the dearth of knowledge on species traits and their functionality-presents a challenge in the application of these approaches. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the trends and gaps in trait-based animal ecology in terms of taxonomic resolution, trait selection, ecosystem type, and geographical region. In addition, we suggest a set of crucial steps to guide trait selection and aid future research to conduct within and cross-taxon comparisons. We identified 1655 articles using virtually all animal groups published from 1999 to 2020. Studies were concentrated in vertebrates, terrestrial habitats, the Palearctic realm, and mostly investigated trophic and habitat dimensions. Additionally, they focused on response traits (79.4%) and largely ignored intraspecific variation (94.6%). Almost 36% of the data sets did not provide the rationale behind the selection of morphological traits. The main limitations of trait-based animal ecology were the use of trait averages and a rare inclusion of intraspecific variability. Nearly one-fifth of the studies based only on response traits conclude that trait diversity impacts ecosystem processes or services without justifying the connection between them or measuring them. We propose a guide for standardizing trait collection that includes the following: (i) determining the type of trait and the mechanism linking the trait to the environment, ecosystem, or the correlation between the environment, trait, and ecosystem, (ii) using a "periodic table of niches" to select the appropriate niche dimension to support a mechanistic trait selection, and (iii) selecting the relevant traits for each retained niche dimension. By addressing these gaps, trait-based animal ecology can become more predictive. This implies that future research will likely focus on collaborating to understand how environmental changes impact animals and their capacity to provide ecosystem services and goods.

Indexed as

functional traitsknowledge shortfallsRaunkiæran shortfallresponse and effect traitstrait‐based ecology

Identifiers

PMID37091571
PMCPMC10115901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.