Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37091535›Full record

ArticleImplementation research and practice

Strategies to recruit rural primary care providers to implement a medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) focused integrated care model.

Renee M Cloutier, Evan S Cole, Brianna L McDonough, Daniel A Lomauro, John P Miller, Abigail L Talbert, Todd M Bear, Nora C Bridges, Abigail L Foulds, Rachel Taber and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation research and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Primary care professionals' perspectives on tailoring buprenorphine training for rural practice.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Renee M CloutierProgram Evaluation and Research Unit, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1795-9149
Evan S ColeDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Brianna L McDonoughProgram Evaluation and Research Unit, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Daniel A LomauroProgram Evaluation and Research Unit, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
John P MillerProgram Evaluation and Research Unit, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Abigail L TalbertProgram Evaluation and Research Unit, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Todd M BearDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Nora C BridgesGraduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Abigail L FouldsDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Rachel TaberDepartment of Behavioral and Community Health Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Adam J GordonProgram for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Education, and Advocacy, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Gerald T CochranProgram for Addiction Research, Clinical Care, Education, and Advocacy, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Julie KmiecDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Julie M DonohueDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
David KelleyOffice of Medical Assistance Programs, Pennsylvania Department of Human Services, Harrisburg, PA, USA.
Ellen DiDomenicoPennsylvania Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs, Harrisburg, PA, USA.
Dale AdairOffice of Medical Assistance Programs, Pennsylvania Department of Human Services, Harrisburg, PA, USA.
Janice L PringleProgram Evaluation and Research Unit, University of Pittsburgh School of Pharmacy, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USPennsylvania Department of Human Services · USUniversity of Utah · USPennsylvania Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs · US

Funding

AHRQ HHS R18 HS025072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Access to providers and programs that provide medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) remains a systemic barrier for patients with opioid use disorder (OUD), particularly if they live in rural areas. The Rural Access to Medication Assisted Treatment (MAT) in Pennsylvania Project (Project RAMP) addressed this problem with a multisystem partnership that recruited, trained, and supported rural primary care providers to provide MOUD and implement an integrated care model (ICM) for patients with OUD. Given the demonstrated efficacy of Project RAMP, this article summarizes our recruitment strategies, including feasibility concerns for further expansion into other regions. Methods: The approach for recruiting implementation sites included two phases: partner outreach and site identification. Once recruited, the Systems Transformation Framework guided planning and implementation activities. Recruitment and implementation activities were assessed with implementation trackers and evaluated by providers via key informant interviews (KIIs). Results: Project RAMP recruited 26 primary care practices from 13 counties, including nine health systems and two private practice groups-exceeding the original target of 24 sites. There was a median of 49 days from first contact to project onboarding. A total of 108 primary care practices spanning 22 health systems declined participation. Findings from the KIIs highlighted the value of engaging PCPs by connecting to a shared vision (i.e., improving the quality of patient care) as well as addressing perceived participation barriers (e.g., offering concierge technical assistance to address lack of training or resources). Conclusion: Findings highlight how successful recruitment activities should leverage the support of health system leadership. Findings also emphasize that aiding recruitment and engagement efforts successfully addressed prescribers' perceived barriers to providing MOUD as well as facilitating better communication among administrators, PCPs, behavioral health professionals, care managers, and patients.

Indexed as

health services accessibilityopiate substitution treatment/methodsopioid-related disorders/diagnosisopioid-related disorders/drug therapyPennsylvaniaquality of health care/organization & administrationrural health servicesthe United States

Identifiers

PMID37091535
PMCPMC9978659
OpenAlexW4321376055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.