Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37091495›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

Cost-Effectiveness of Inter-Professional Collaboration to Reduce Hospitalisations in Nursing Home Residents: Results from the German Interprof ACT Trial.

Louisa-Kristin Muntendorf, Katrin Balzer, Tim Friede, Eva Hummers, Hans-Helmut König, Christiane Müller, Martin Scherer, Linda Steyer, Britta Tetzlaff, Sebastian Pfeiffer and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Louisa-Kristin MuntendorfUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institute of Health Services Research and Health Economics, Martinistraße 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5736-2438
Katrin BalzerInstitute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Nursing Research Unit, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus 50, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0151-2262
Tim FriedeDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 32, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5347-7441
Eva HummersDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 38, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2707-6067
Hans-Helmut KönigUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institute of Health Services Research and Health Economics, Martinistraße 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5711-6862
Christiane MüllerDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 38, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7871-0884
Martin SchererDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3448-9679
Linda SteyerInstitute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, Nursing Research Unit, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus 50, D-23538 Lübeck, Germany.
Britta TetzlaffDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5532-1424
Sebastian PfeifferDepartment of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 32, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4458-0292
Alexander KonnopkaUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Institute of Health Services Research and Health Economics, Martinistraße 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2605-3456
interprof ACT Consortium
Universität Hamburg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The German multi-centre cluster-randomised controlled trial Methods: Cost-effectiveness of Results: Base case results showed non-significant cost savings of 851.88€ and non-significant QALY loss of -0,056. Discussion: Dependency levels at baseline were non-significantly higher in IG compared to control group (CG). Lack of baseline costing data eliminated possibility to evaluate changes in costs due to the Conclusion:

Indexed as

cost-effectivenessintegrated careinter-professional relationsnursing homesphysician-nurserandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID37091495
PMCPMC10120601
OpenAlexW4366434348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.