ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2023
A comparative study of 10% lidocaine spray versus eutectic mixture of 2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine (EMLA) to attenuate pain of peripheral venous cannulation in children: A prospective randomized control trial at a tertiary care centre.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of a topical spray of lidocaine 10% on maternal satisfaction prior to spinal needle insertion for cesarean delivery in North India: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2026Article
- Comparing ethyl chloride and 10% lignocaine spray for pediatric intravenous cannulation pain relief.Clinical and experimental pediatrics · 2026Article
- Efficacy of 10% lidocaine gel for injection site pain associated with treprostinil in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension: a report of four cases.JA clinical reports · 2025Article
- Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Infographics of published articles.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) (2.5% lidocaine and 2.5% prilocaine) cream is the commonly used topical anesthetic for painful intradermal procedures. Topical 10% lidocaine spray has successfully been used to anesthetize mucosal surfaces. Owing to its skin penetrative properties, this study was conducted to compare dermal analgesia between 10% lidocaine spray and EMLA cream for intravenous (IV) cannulation in children. Methods: In this prospective single-blind randomized study, ninety-nine Paediatric patients were assigned into Group A (number(n) =51) with Lignocaine 10% spray applied 10 minutes and Group B (n = 48) EMLA cream applied 1 hour prior to cannulation. Vital signs were recorded before, during, and after the procedure. The primary objective of the study was assessment of severity of pain during IV cannulation using 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Secondary objectives such as ease of cannulation and adverse effects were also noted. Results: All cannulations were performed in the first attempt with no adverse effects in both lidocaine group and EMLA group. The median (interquartile range) VAS score was 2 cm (1 to 3) in both the groups with a Conclusion: Topical 10% lidocaine spray applied ten minutes before venous cannulation is as effective as EMLA cream applied an hour before cannulation in children in providing dermal analgesia for intravenous cannulation with an added advantage of rapid onset of action in the former group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.