Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37091301›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2023

Cracking the genetic code with neural networks.

Marc Joiret, Marine Leclercq, Gaspard Lambrechts, Francesca Rapino, Pierre Close, Gilles Louppe, Liesbet Geris

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marc JoiretBiomechanics Research Unit, GIGA in Silico Medicine, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Marine LeclercqCancer Signaling, GIGA Stem Cells, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Gaspard LambrechtsDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning, Montefiore Institute, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Francesca RapinoCancer Signaling, GIGA Stem Cells, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Pierre CloseCancer Signaling, GIGA Stem Cells, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Gilles LouppeDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning, Montefiore Institute, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
Liesbet GerisBiomechanics Research Unit, GIGA in Silico Medicine, Liège University, Liège, Belgium.
University of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic code is textbook scientific knowledge that was soundly established without resorting to Artificial Intelligence (AI). The goal of our study was to check whether a neural network could re-discover, on its own, the mapping links between codons and amino acids and build the complete deciphering dictionary upon presentation of transcripts proteins data training pairs. We compared different Deep Learning neural network architectures and estimated quantitatively the size of the required human transcriptomic training set to achieve the best possible accuracy in the codon-to-amino-acid mapping. We also investigated the effect of a codon embedding layer assessing the semantic similarity between codons on the rate of increase of the training accuracy. We further investigated the benefit of quantifying and using the unbalanced representations of amino acids within real human proteins for a faster deciphering of rare amino acids codons. Deep neural networks require huge amount of data to train them. Deciphering the genetic code by a neural network is no exception. A test accuracy of 100% and the unequivocal deciphering of rare codons such as the tryptophan codon or the stop codons require a training dataset of the order of 4-22 millions cumulated pairs of codons with their associated amino acids presented to the neural network over around 7-40 training epochs, depending on the architecture and settings. We confirm that the wide generic capacities and modularity of deep neural networks allow them to be customized easily to learn the deciphering task of the genetic code efficiently.

Indexed as

Artificial Intelligencecodon embeddingcodon usagedata efficiencydeep neural networkgenetic code decipheringnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID37091301
PMCPMC10117997
OpenAlexW4362671481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.