Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37091280›Full record

ReviewThe Saudi dental journal2023

The role of Vitamin D as an adjunct for bone regeneration: A systematic review of literature.

Ramalingam Sundar, A Bhagavandas Rai, J Naveen Kumar, Darshan Devang Divakar

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Saudi dental journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Vitamin D and Fracture Healing.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Impact of Vitamin DJournal of functional biomaterials · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ramalingam SundarDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Pacific Dental College & Hospital, Pacific Academy of Higher Education and Research (PAHER) University, Udaipur, India.
A Bhagavandas RaiDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Pacific Dental College & Hospital, Pacific Academy of Higher Education and Research (PAHER) University, Udaipur, India.
J Naveen KumarDept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College and Hospital, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research University, Chennai, India.
Darshan Devang DivakarDental Biomaterials Research Chair, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; Dept. of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Levy Mwanawasa Medical University (LMMU), Lusaka, Zambia.
Pacific Dental College and Hospital · INKing Saud University · SASri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: In spite of bone's healing capacity, critical-size bone defect regeneration and Methods: Comprehensive database search of indexed literature, published between January 1990 and June 2022, was carried out. English language articles fulfilling inclusion criteria (clinical/in vivo studies evaluating bone regeneration including osseointegration and in vitro studies assessing osteogenic differentiation, with adjunct Vit.D) were identified and screened. Results: Database search identified 384 titles. After sequential title, abstract and full-text screening, 23 studies (in vitro - 9/in vivo - 14) were selected for review. Vit.D as an adjunct with stem cells and osteoblasts resulted in enhanced osteogenic differentiation and upregulation of genes coding for bone matrix proteins and alkaline phosphatase. When used in vivo, Vit.D resulted in early and increased new bone formation and mineralization within osseous defects, and better bone implant contact and osseointegration, around implants. Adjunct Vit.D in animals with induced systemic illnesses resulted in bone defect regeneration and osseointegration comparable to healthy animals. While systemic and local administration of Vit.D resulted in enhanced bone defect healing, outcomes were superior with systemic route. Conclusions: Based on this review, adjunct Vit.D enhances bone defect regeneration and osseointegration. In vitro application of Vit.D to stem cells and osteoblasts enhances osteogenic differentiation. Vit.D is a potentially non-invasive and inexpensive adjunct for clinical bone regeneration and osseointegration. Long term clinical trials are recommended to establish protocols relating to type, dosage, frequency, duration and route of administration.

Indexed as

Bone defect regenerationCalcitriolCholecalciferolErgocalciferolOsseointegrationVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID37091280
PMCPMC10114593
OpenAlexW4322753270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.