Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37091256›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Combined neuromuscular electrical stimulation and transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation increases motor cortical plasticity in healthy humans.

Tadaki Koseki, Daisuke Kudo, Kaito Yoshida, Mitsuhiro Nito, Keita Takano, Masafumi Jin, Shigeo Tanabe, Toshiaki Sato, Hiroshi Katoh, Tomofumi Yamaguchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tadaki KosekiGraduate School of Health Sciences, Yamagata Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Yamagata, Japan.
Daisuke KudoGraduate School of Health Sciences, Yamagata Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Yamagata, Japan.
Kaito YoshidaGraduate School of Health Sciences, Yamagata Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Yamagata, Japan.
Mitsuhiro NitoDepartment of Anatomy and Structural Science, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
Keita TakanoGraduate School of Health Sciences, Yamagata Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Yamagata, Japan.
Masafumi JinGraduate School of Health Sciences, Yamagata Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Yamagata, Japan.
Shigeo TanabeFaculty of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Toshiaki SatoDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Yamagata Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Yamagata, Japan.
Hiroshi KatohDepartment of Physical Therapy, Yamagata Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Yamagata, Japan.
Tomofumi YamaguchiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yamagata Prefectural University of Health Sciences · JPFujita Health University · JPJuntendo University · JPYamagata University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) induces neural plasticity of the central nervous system (CNS) and improves motor function in patients with CNS lesions. However, the extended stimulus duration of NMES reduces its clinical applicability. Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (tsDCS), which increases afferent input, may enhance the effects and reduce the stimulus duration of NMES. This study investigated the excitability of the motor cortex, somatosensory cortex, and spinal motor neurons after the combined stimulation of NMES and tsDCS. Methods: Among the 55 participants in this study, 24 were allocated to experiment 1, 15 to experiment 2, and 16 to experiment 3. They received intervention for 20 min on different days: (1) NMES combined with tsDCS (NMES + tsDCS), (2) NMES combined with sham tsDCS (NMES + sham tsDCS), and (3) sham NMES combined with tsDCS (sham NMES + tsDCS). NMES was delivered to the right common peroneal nerve at 25 Hz with the intensity at 120% of the motor threshold. For tsDCS, the cathodal electrode was positioned on the thoracic 10th-12th vertebral levels, and the anodal electrode was located on the right shoulder. The stimulus intensity was 2.5 mA. In experiment 1, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and short-latency intracortical inhibition (SICI) were measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation up to 60 min after stimulation. The spinal motor neurons' excitability was assessed by recording the posterior root muscle reflex (PRMR) induced Results: Compared to before the stimulation, NMES + tsDCS significantly increased MEP for 60 min or more, and significantly decreased SICI immediately after. Conversely contrast, the PRMR significantly decreased immediately after, and SEPs were unchanged. Discussion: These results suggest that simultaneous afferent inputs from different stimulus positions critically induce primary motor cortex plasticity. The combined stimulation of NMES with tsDCS may facilitate the development of a new neurorehabilitation technique.

Indexed as

afferent inputcorticospinal projectionmotor cortical excitabilityneural plasticityspinal excitability

Identifiers

PMID37091256
PMCPMC10115158
OpenAlexW4316041457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.