Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37091222›Full record

ArticleGlobal heart2023

Focused Chest Pain Assessment for Early Detection of Acute Coronary Syndrome: Development of a Cardiovascular Digital Health Intervention.

Mifetika Lukitasari, Sony Apriliyawan, Halidah Manistamara, Yurike Olivia Sella, Mohammad Saifur Rohman, Jitendra Jonnagaddala

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global heart, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Mifetika LukitasariSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3971-7418
Sony ApriliyawanSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Brawijaya University, Malang, East Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0009-0003-8613-2150
Halidah ManistamaraSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Brawijaya University, Malang, East Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-0137-6635
Yurike Olivia SellaSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Brawijaya University, Malang, East Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-5924-1437
Mohammad Saifur RohmanCardiovascular Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Brawijaya University, Malang, East Java, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-6461-2223
Jitendra JonnagaddalaSchool of Population Health, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6461-2223
University of Brawijaya · IDUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chest pain misinterpretation is the leading cause of pre-hospital delay in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aims to identify and differentiate the chest pain characteristics associated with ACS. Methods: A total of 164 patients with a primary complaint of chest pain in the ER were included in the study. ACS diagnosis was made by a cardiologist based on the WHO criteria, and the patients were interviewed 48 hours after their admission. Furthermore, every question was analysed using the crosstabs method to obtain the odds ratio, and logistic regression analysis was applied to identify the model of focused questions on chest pain assessment. Results: Among the samples, 50% of them had an ACS. Four questions fitted the final model of ACS chest pain focused questions: 1) Did the chest pain occur at the left/middle chest? 2) Did the chest pain radiate to the back? 3) Was the chest pain provoked by activity and relieved by rest? 4) Was the chest pain provoked by food ingestion, positional changes, or breathing? This model has 92.7% sensitivity, 84.1% specificity, 85% positive predictive value (PPV), 86% negative predictive value (NPV), and 86% accuracy. After adjusting for gender and diabetes mellitus (DM), the final model has a significant increase in Nagelkerke R-square to 0.737 and Hosmer and Lemeshow test statistic of 0.639. Conclusion: Focused questions on 1) left/middle chest pain, 2) retrosternal chest pain, 3) exertional chest pain that is relieved by rest, and 4) chest pain from food ingestion, positional changes, or breathing triggering can be used to rule out ACS with high predictive value. The findings from this study can be used in health promotion materials and campaigns to improve public awareness regarding ACS symptoms. Additionally, digital health interventions to triage patients' suffering with chest pain can also be developed.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeChest PainHumansPain MeasurementPredictive Value of TestsTriageacute coronary syndromechest pain assessmentdigital health

Identifiers

PMID37091222
PMCPMC10120604
OpenAlexW4366549953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.