Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37091128›Full record

ArticleProcedia CIRP2023

Reuse of end-of-life personal protective equipment in hot asphalt mixtures: an environmental evaluation.

Daniele Landi, Marco Marconi, Edoardo Bocci, Mattia Gianvincenzi, Christian Spreafico

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Procedia CIRP, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniele LandiDepartment of Management, Information and Production Engineering, Università degli Studi di Bergamo, Via Pasubio 7/b, 24044 Dalmine (BG), Italy.
Marco MarconiDepartment of Economics, Engineering, Society and Business Organization, Università degli Studi della Tuscia, Largo dell'Università, 01100 Viterbo, Italy.
Edoardo BocciFaculty of Engineering, eCampus University, Novedrate, 22060, Como, Italy.
Mattia GianvincenziDepartment of Economics, Engineering, Society and Business Organization, Università degli Studi della Tuscia, Largo dell'Università, 01100 Viterbo, Italy.
Christian SpreaficoDepartment of Management, Information and Production Engineering, Università degli Studi di Bergamo, Via Pasubio 7/b, 24044 Dalmine (BG), Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the present global health emergency, face masks, gowns, caps, gloves play a key role in limiting the diffusion of the COVID-19 pandemic, by acting as physical barriers to avoid droplets and filtrate exhalations coming from infected subjects. Since the most widespread devices are disposable products made of plastic or rubber materials, this means that relevant quantities of fossil resources are consumed, and huge amounts of wastes are generated. Currently the end of life of personal protective equipment (PPE) represents a problem in environmental, economic, and social terms. The market considers two possible disposal scenarios: incineration with energy recovery or landfill. In both cases, significant impacts are achieved both on the environment and on human health. This study aims to propose and validate a new scenario for PPE based on material reuse for bituminous conglomerates. The Life Cycle Assessment methodology and the experimental tests has been used to assess the environmental impacts in terms of both ReCiPe midpoints and endpoints and for demonstrate the technical feasibility of this new scenario. From an environmental point of view, relevant benefits were observed in comparison with the standard incineration for energy recovery or disposal in landfill.

Indexed as

Circula EconomyDPIEnviromental impactReuse

Identifiers

PMID37091128
PMCPMC10110393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.