Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37091033›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology open science2023

Prostate Cancer IRE Study (PRIS): A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Focal Therapy to Radical Treatment in Localized Prostate Cancer.

Anna Lantz, Per Nordlund, Ugo Falagario, Fredrik Jäderling, Orhan Özbek, Mark Clements, Andrea Discacciati, Henrik Grönberg, Martin Eklund, Phillip Stricker and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European urology open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05513443 (Prostate Cancer IRE Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05513443 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Prostate Cancer IRE Study (PRIS) - A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Focal to Radical Treatment in Localized Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorKarolinska InstitutetRan2022 to 2027Enrolled184ConditionsProstate CancerArmsIrreversible electroporation, IRE, Radical prostatectomy, Radiation therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Anna LantzDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Per NordlundDepartment of Urology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ugo FalagarioDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Fredrik JäderlingDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Orhan ÖzbekDepartment of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mark ClementsDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Andrea DiscacciatiDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Henrik GrönbergDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Martin EklundDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Phillip StrickerSt. Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Mark EmbertonDepartment of Surgery and Interventional Sciences, University College London, University College Hospital, London, UK.
Markus AlyDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Tobias NordströmDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEProstate Cancer Research · GBSaint Göran Hospital · SEStockholm South General Hospital · SEUniversity College Hospital · GBUniversity of Foggia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of focal treatments (FTs) in prostate cancer (PCa) is to treat lesions while preserving surrounding benign tissue and anatomic structures. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a nonthermal technique that uses high-voltage electric pulses to increase membrane permeability and induce membrane disruption in cells, which potentially causes less damage to the surrounding tissue in comparison to other ablative techniques. We summarize the study protocol for the Prostate Cancer IRE Study (PRIS), which involves two parallel randomized controlled trials comparing IRE with (1) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) or (2) radiotherapy in men with newly diagnosed intermediate-risk PCa (NCT05513443). To reduce the number of patients for inclusion and the study duration, the primary outcomes are functional outcomes: urinary incontinence in study 1 and irritative urinary symptoms in study 2. Providing evidence of the lower impact of IRE on functional outcomes will lay a foundation for the design of future multicenter studies with an oncological outcome as the primary endpoint. Erectile function, quality of life, treatment failure, adverse events, and cost effectiveness will be evaluated as secondary objectives. Patients diagnosed with Gleason score 3 + 4 or 4 + 3 PCa from a single lesion visible on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without any Gleason grade 4 or higher in systematic biopsies outside of the target (unifocal significant disease), aged ≥40 yr, with no established extraprostatic extension on multiparametric MRI, a lesion volume of <1.5 cm

Indexed as

Focal therapyIrreversible electroporationProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID37091033
PMCPMC10114162
OpenAlexW4362721136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.